[Coverage Report] Test Coverage Report — 2026-08-27 #7800
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-09-03T21:19:23.438Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
📊 Test Coverage Report — 2026-08-27
Overall Coverage
The firewall maintains 92.65% statement coverage and 86.04% branch coverage across 240+ source files, demonstrating comprehensive test coverage for a security-critical codebase. All metrics exceed industry best practices (80%).
🛡️ Security-Critical Path Status
Core network isolation and domain filtering modules show excellent coverage:
Verdict: Network isolation (iptables) and HTTP ACL filtering (Squid) are 100% covered. Entry point has minimal but identified gaps.
📋 Coverage Table
Excellent (>98%):
Good (95–98%):
Acceptable (85–94%):
🔧 Function Audit
Total Functions: 1,550 / 1,664 covered (93.14%)
Uncovered functions (114 / 1,664):
src/bounded-execution/finite-disclosure.ts: 4.54% (2/44 functions)📅 Recent Source Changes (last 7 days)
Based on coverage snapshot timestamp (2026-08-27):
🔎 Notable Findings
[CRITICAL] Bounded Execution Gap:
src/bounded-execution/finite-disclosure.tsshows 9.26% statement coverage and 0.26% branch coverage — this module handles information budget limits but is nearly untested. This is a new/preview feature (not used by default).[MEDIUM] Config Assembly Gaps:
src/commands/validators/config-assembly.tsat 73.68% statements and 25% branches — validator logic for multi-source config merging has conditional branches that aren't exercised in tests.[MEDIUM] Enclave Runtime Preflight:
src/enclave/runtime-preflight.tsat 66.66% statements and 41.02% branches — enclave health checks and readiness detection have uncovered paths (feature in rollout).[LOW] MicroVM Rootfs:
src/microvm/rootfs.tsat 72% statements and 54.54% branches — Cloud Hypervisor backend path setup has conditional branches for different configs.🎯 Recommendations
🔴 High Priority
1. Close Bounded Execution Coverage Gap (statements: 9.26% → target 80%)
src/bounded-execution/finite-disclosure.ts2. Config Assembly Validator Branches (branches: 25% → target 85%)
src/commands/validators/config-assembly.ts🟡 Medium Priority
3. Enclave Runtime Preflight Paths (statements: 66.66% → target 85%)
src/enclave/runtime-preflight.tsgateway readiness detection4. CLI Entry Point Branches (branches: 50% → target 80%)
src/cli.ts🟢 Low Priority
5. MicroVM Rootfs Conditional Paths (branches: 54.54% → target 80%)
Summary: Overall test coverage is excellent (92.65% statements, 86.04% branches). Security-critical paths (iptables rules and Squid ACL) are 100% covered. Main gaps are in emerging features (bounded-execution, enclaves) and edge cases in config validation. No urgent coverage debt for GA features.
All reactions