[copilot-session-insights] Daily Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-06-15 #39346
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot Session Insights. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #39513. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🤖 Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-06-15
Executive Summary
cross_session_branch_lifecycleKey Metrics
📈 Session Trends Analysis
Completion Patterns
Completion ticked up from 8% (06-14) to 12% (06-15), but stays below the 7-day average of 17.1% (06-09...06-15: 0, 40, 18, 4, 38, 8, 12). The saw-tooth
recovery_regression_oscillationpersists — today is a low-mid rung between the 40%/38% spikes (06-10/06-13), not a sustained recovery.Duration & Efficiency
Purely bimodal: only the 6 successful sessions had nonzero duration; the other 44 were 0-duration gate sweeps, pinning median at 0 while the 1.48-min mean is driven by a few long cloud-agent/comment runs.
Success Factors ✅
Failure Signals⚠️
action_requiredCI gates awaiting approval — not task failures, but they swamp the signal.success_duration_floorpartial break: trivial Haiku Printer (0.23 min) and Code Review (6.25 min) succeeded sub-8min; the ≥8-min floor holds only for cloud-agent/comment-addressing provenance.Prompt Quality Analysis 📝
Per-Prompt Breakdown
Prompt-level analysis requires agent transcripts, unavailable this run (23rd+ consecutive day). Metadata exposes no task descriptions. We can only infer from provenance: success concentrates in two high-context workflow types —
Running Copilot cloud agentandAddressing comment on PR #NNNN— both carrying scoped, specific context. The 0-duration gate sweeps carry no agent prompt at all. No high/medium/low breakdown is possible until transcript access is restored.Orphaned Branch Escalation Alerts 🚨
Escalation Candidate Details
✅ No orphaned branches exceed the threshold today. At analysis time only 2 in-progress runs existed, both on
main(housekeeping + this workflow). No copilot/* branch had an active gate sweep, so none can be orphaned. Of 13 open PRs, all 6 copilot/* PRs (#39300, #39282, #39266, #39164, #39156, #39100) have Copilot assigned; the other 7 are housekeeping PRs with 0 gate firings.CI Waste Estimate: 0 gate-hours ≈ 0 CI-minutes wasted — ~25th consecutive healthy day vs the 40% baseline.
Notable Observations
Timing, Branch Concentration & Transcript-gated metrics
Experimental Analysis
Strategy:
cross_session_branch_lifecycle(Cross-Session Learning — per-branch volume vs success density).Findings: Every branch yields ~1 substantive success regardless of session count — the "real work" per branch is a single cloud-agent/comment run surrounded by gate noise. Per-branch completion is inversely correlated with gate footprint: the busiest branch (21 sessions) has the lowest completion (4.8%); the lightest (3 sessions) the highest (33.3%). High session counts reflect gate-sweep volume, not productivity. Confirms the existing
branch_symmetric_success_distributionpattern.Effectiveness: Medium. Recommendation: Keep — adopt a gate-normalized completion metric (successes ÷ substantive sessions).
Actionable Recommendations
For Users
For System (Impact)
For Tool Development
Statistical Summary
Next Steps
Run ID: 27534279744 · Workflow: Copilot Session Insights · 2026-06-15
References: §27519876606 · §27534279744
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions