[safe-output-health] π₯ Safe Output Health Report β 2026-07-08 (CLEAN: 0 safe-output job failures / 46 runs) #44203
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Safe Output Health Monitor. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #44508. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
π₯ Safe Output Health Report β 2026-07-08
Executive Summary
Verdict: CLEAN day for safe outputs. Every
safe_outputsjob and every "Process Safe Outputs" / "Upload Safe Outputs Items" step succeeded across all 46 runs. This is the 11th audited clean day of the streak (06-27 β 07-08; 07-06 unaudited). The only run-level failures were 7 upstream agent-job failures β explicitly out of scope β each withsafe_outputs = successvia clean failure-path handoff.Safe Output Job Statistics
Per-message handler breakdown is not observable this window: every run was
actuation_style=read_onlywithSafeItemsCount=0(nocreate_discussion/create_issue/add_comment/create_pull_request/ review-comment messages were emitted). Job conclusions are authoritative; the Process Safe Outputs step logs were not pre-bundled.Error Clusters
No in-scope safe-output error clusters this window. 0 hard failures, 0 failed messages, 0 collection-time rejections, 0 soft recoveries.
Out-of-scope agent-job failures (not safe-output failures)
All 7 run-level failures were upstream
agent-job failures; the downstreamsafe_outputsjob succeeded in each via clean handoff.7 agent-job failures (safe_outputs succeeded in all)
The 3 Smoke CI failures are the recurring benign "Execute Copilot CLI fail on main" push-event pattern seen repeatedly in prior audits. All are handled by the agent-health monitor, not this one.
Root Cause Analysis
add_comment β discussion "Resource not accessible by integration"permission-scope defect was not exercised (no workflow_dispatch Smoke Claude/Copilot in window).Recommendations
Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
None. No in-scope safe-output failures occurred.
Standing-Open Items (unchanged, none re-exercised today)
Changeset Generator
patch-format:bundlepush hard-fail β Priority: High (highest open production signature)SafeItemsCount=0, no changeset push) β signature not re-exercised. Last actuating failure 2026-06-26 (~12 days ago); remediation still UNVALIDATED.git config --global --add safe.directoryin the bridge HOME context / align bridge user+HOME with container; (b) pre-bundle the Process Safe Outputs step log on failure so the exact error is recoverable; (c) graceful retry/skip so a missing changeset does not red the daily run.review_path_unresolved_422Path-variant fallback β Priority: Mediumpr_review_buffer.cjs:554β predicate matches only"Line could not be resolved", not the"Path could not be resolved"variant that caused the 2026-05-27 regression."Path could not be resolved"; both variants then share the existing (correct) retry block.jsweep branch-pin / bundle family β Priority: Medium
Process Improvements
SafeItemsCountaggregator undercount (tracked since 05-31): reconcile the read-only actuation metric with the bash_safeoutputs CLI-wrapper writes. Today the 0 count is corroborated by 0 Error/Warning/Noop counts (a genuinely read-only window), so no correctness concern this time β but the metric remains unreliable as a write-volume signal.Work Item Plans
Work Item 1: Validate the
review_path_unresolved_422Path-variant fallbackpr_review_buffer.cjs:554only matches the "Line could not be resolved" 422; the "Path could not be resolved" variant (root cause of the 2026-05-27 regression) still bypasses it. The happy path is healthy, but the recovery path has never fired in production across 40 consecutive audits.pr_review_buffer.cjs:554matches both "Line could not be resolved" and "Path could not be resolved".Work Item 2: Harden Changeset Generator bundle-transport push
push_to_pull_request_branchwithpatch-format:bundlehard-failed twice (06-23, 06-26) with git "dubious ownership" because the bridge runs outside the container as a different user/HOME.git config --global --add safe.directory(or aligns bridge user+HOME with the container).Historical Context
review_path_unresolved_422Path-variant fallback (40 consecutive audits unvalidated).Metrics and KPIs
safe_outputs(0 failures across all runs)Next Steps
pr_review_buffer.cjs:554Path-variant predicate fix + a triggering test (removes the 40-audit validation gap).safe.directoryfix (highest open production signature).References:
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
awmgmcpgSee Network Configuration for more information.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions