You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This daily performance summary covers activity in the github/gh-aw repository over the last 90 days (data as of 2026-07-08). The project shows strong automated workflow activity with 200 pull requests and 1,000 issues processed. The automation-first approach is clear: the majority of PRs and issues are bot-generated as part of the agentic CI/CD pipeline, reflecting a healthy, high-velocity project. PR merge rates are excellent at 66.5%, and the average merge time of just 4.4 hours underscores rapid iteration cycles.
Issue resolution is similarly efficient: 89.1% of all tracked issues are closed, with an average resolution time of 13.9 hours. Discussions are used primarily for audits and announcements, with 63% of the 100 most recent discussions being audit reports — consistent with the project's automated governance model.
Key Highlights
✅ 133 PRs merged (66.5% merge rate)
📊 891 issues resolved (89.1% close rate)
💬 100 discussions tracked (63 audits, 21 general, 16 announcements)
⏱️ Average PR merge time: 4.4 hours
⏱️ Average issue close time: 13.9 hours
👥 4 unique PR contributors
🏷️ Top label: automation (455 issues)
🚨 Critical Performance Issues
No critical performance issues detected. The project demonstrates healthy automation throughput with fast merge and resolution times. The contributor count (4 unique PR authors) is by design for an agentic workflow repository.
📈 Activity Overview
Activity is dominated by issues (1,000 tracked), driven by the high volume of automated workflow runs creating and closing tracking issues. Pull requests (200) represent code changes and workflow improvements, while discussions (100) are used for structured audit reports and announcements.
📊 Detailed Benchmark Results
🎯 Resolution Metrics
PR distribution: 133 merged (66.5%), 16 open (8%), and 51 closed-without-merge (25.5%). The high merge rate indicates good PR quality. Issue resolution stands at 89.1% closed, with only 109 issues currently open — well within a healthy backlog range for an active automated system.
⚡ Velocity Metrics
The 4.4-hour average PR merge time reflects automated CI checks completing quickly. Issue close time of 13.9 hours is fast for a project relying on async agentic workflows. The 0% discussion answer rate aligns with the repository's use of discussions as report archives rather than Q&A forums.
Monitor open PR backlog: 16 open PRs — review any PRs open >24 hours that may need human intervention or re-triggering.
Track "closed-not-merged" PRs: 51 PRs (25.5%) were closed without merging. Review if these represent automated cleanup, intentional abandonment, or failures that should be retried.
Issue label hygiene: The cookie label (235 issues) appears non-standard — consider auditing whether this label is being applied correctly by automation, or if it should be renamed for clarity.
Report generated automatically by the Daily Performance Summary workflow Data source: github/gh-aw — Last 90 days | Run §28975517375 Powered by Safe-Input MCP Tools — github-pr-query, github-issue-query, github-discussion-query
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Performance Overview
This daily performance summary covers activity in the github/gh-aw repository over the last 90 days (data as of 2026-07-08). The project shows strong automated workflow activity with 200 pull requests and 1,000 issues processed. The automation-first approach is clear: the majority of PRs and issues are bot-generated as part of the agentic CI/CD pipeline, reflecting a healthy, high-velocity project. PR merge rates are excellent at 66.5%, and the average merge time of just 4.4 hours underscores rapid iteration cycles.
Issue resolution is similarly efficient: 89.1% of all tracked issues are closed, with an average resolution time of 13.9 hours. Discussions are used primarily for audits and announcements, with 63% of the 100 most recent discussions being audit reports — consistent with the project's automated governance model.
Key Highlights
🚨 Critical Performance Issues
No critical performance issues detected. The project demonstrates healthy automation throughput with fast merge and resolution times. The contributor count (4 unique PR authors) is by design for an agentic workflow repository.
📈 Activity Overview
Activity is dominated by issues (1,000 tracked), driven by the high volume of automated workflow runs creating and closing tracking issues. Pull requests (200) represent code changes and workflow improvements, while discussions (100) are used for structured audit reports and announcements.
📊 Detailed Benchmark Results
🎯 Resolution Metrics
PR distribution: 133 merged (66.5%), 16 open (8%), and 51 closed-without-merge (25.5%). The high merge rate indicates good PR quality. Issue resolution stands at 89.1% closed, with only 109 issues currently open — well within a healthy backlog range for an active automated system.
⚡ Velocity Metrics
The 4.4-hour average PR merge time reflects automated CI checks completing quickly. Issue close time of 13.9 hours is fast for a project relying on async agentic workflows. The 0% discussion answer rate aligns with the repository's use of discussions as report archives rather than Q&A forums.
📊 Complete Performance Data
Pull Requests
Issues
Top Issue Labels
Discussions
📈 Historical Context
Previous daily performance reports:
💡 Optimization Recommendations
cookielabel (235 issues) appears non-standard — consider auditing whether this label is being applied correctly by automation, or if it should be renamed for clarity.Report generated automatically by the Daily Performance Summary workflow
Data source: github/gh-aw — Last 90 days | Run §28975517375
Powered by Safe-Input MCP Tools — github-pr-query, github-issue-query, github-discussion-query
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions