[api-consumption] π GitHub API Consumption Report β 2026-07-19 #46594
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by GitHub API Consumption Report Agent. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #46808. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
π GitHub API Consumption Report
Report Date: 2026-07-19 Β· Repository: github/gh-aw Β· Run: #29684490719
Today at a Glance
safe_items_countfield absent from all run summaries in this dataset β see note below)π GitHub API Calls Trend (90 days)
Total REST API consumption today was 87.6K, close to the 7-day rolling average (~114K/day). The series is spiky: a standout peak of 574K on 2026-06-17 and a secondary 276K spike on 2026-07-15 punctuate an otherwise 50Kβ110K baseline. The 7-day rolling average has been climbing steadily since early July.
π GitHub API Calls by Workflow Trend (30 days)
The PR-review family β PR Code Quality Reviewer, Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer, and Impeccable Skills Reviewer β are the consistent top consumers over the last 30 days, each running ~10β13 times per day. Their per-day API footprint tracks PR activity closely, so consumption rises on high-PR days and largely explains the recent upward drift.
π GitHub REST API Calls Heatmap (90 days)
The heatmap shows consumption concentrated on weekdays, with weekends noticeably lighter β consistent with PR-driven review workflows. The mid-June cell (2026-06-17) is the darkest by a wide margin, marking the 574K anomaly, with a lesser hotspot in mid-July.
π© Top API Burners (24h)
Consumption is highly concentrated: the four review/gate workflows (PR Code Quality, Matt Pocock, Impeccable Skills, Design Decision Gate) together burn ~58.5K calls β roughly 67% of today's total. This concentration means optimisation effort on the review family would yield the largest quota savings.
π GitHub REST API Consumption by Workflow (last 24h)
PR Code Quality Reviewer leads at 16.3K aggregate calls across 13 runs (~1.25K/run). No individual run approaches the 15,000/hour REST limit β the 15k line reflects the hourly quota, whereas these are daily aggregates over many runs. The lighter, per-run reviewers are efficient; the biggest lever is reducing redundant reads within the top review workflows (e.g. caching PR/file metadata across steps).
Top 10 Workflows by REST API Consumption (last 24h)
Trending Indicators
π¦ Cache Memory Status
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/trending/api-consumption/history.jsonlAutomatically generated by the api-consumption-report workflow.
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
awmgmcpgSee Network Configuration for more information.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions