[mcp-analysis] MCP Structural Analysis - 2026-07-31 #49334
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-08-01T12:46:36.400Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Overview
Tested 11 tools across 10 toolsets against
github/gh-aw(plus the prompt-injected<github-context>block). Total tokens today: 8,168. Average usefulness rating: 3.36/5. Best:github_contextandlist_discussions/list_pull_requests(⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐). Worst:get_teams(⭐, permission denied — consistent with every prior run).New finding this run:
search_repositorieswith an explicitrepo:qualifier returned an unrelated top hit (github/gitignore, ranked by star count) instead of the targeted repo — the qualifier doesn't appear to scope results reliably.github_context/list_discussions/list_pull_requests: 5/5get_teams: 1/5Full Structural Analysis Report
Usefulness Ratings for Agentic Work
fields[]projection cuts payload to ~50 tok, fully actionableper_page/perPagesilently ignored — returns ~30 of 342 workflows regardlessrepo:qualifier not honored — returned an unrelated popular repoSchema Analysis
*_urlper item, unbounded pagerepo:qualifierResponse Size Analysis (30-day average by toolset)
Tool-by-Tool Analysis (2026-07-31)
fields[]projection near-optimalrepo:qualifier not honored30-Day Trend Summary
Recommendations
github_context,list_discussions,list_pull_requests(withfields[]),get_label,list_code_scanning_alerts(empty case),get_file_contents.list_workflows(pagination paramper_pageis silently ignored — a recurring finding across many runs),list_issues/search_issues(integrity-filtered results are opaque — no in-band marker distinguishes "genuinely empty" from "filtered"),search_repositories(therepo:qualifier does not reliably scope to the named repository),get_teams(unusable under the read-only integration token in this environment).github_context(75 tok),list_discussions(165 tok),list_pull_requestswith field projection (50 tok),get_label(38 tok).get_file_contentson large files (README ~3.6k-12k+ tok depending on growth),list_workflows(~3.9k tok, unbounded).Visualizations
Response Size by Toolset
Usefulness Ratings
Daily Token Trend
Size vs Usefulness
All reactions