[audit-workflows] Daily Agentic Workflow Audit — 2026-08-01 (92.5% success, 26-day audit gap flagged) #49657
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Agentic Workflow Audit Agent. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #49857. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Overview
First audit since 2026-07-06 — a 26-day gap in audit history that this report flags as its own anomaly (schedule likely stalled; see Anomalies below). Window: 2026-07-31T21:30Z → 2026-08-01T21:11Z (~23.7h), 240 runs across 6 engines.
Key metrics
Engine mix: copilot 145, pi 42, claude 36, codex 11, antigravity 3, gemini 3, null 1 (engine classified via
aw_info.jsonengine_id, not.lock.ymlscanning).All 18 real failures resolve to two already-known recurring issues plus one novel signature — no unattributed failures this window.
Recurring known issues (confirmed again today)
copilot-sdk-driver-failures (recurrence #25, open since 2026-06-02) — 8 runs failed at "Execute GitHub Copilot CLI" 0-turn in the
agentjob. PR Code Quality Reviewer is worst-hit at 10/15 = 66.7% success (e.g. §30689984827, §30715678987), plus single fails on daily-experiment-report, Discussion Task Miner, and Tidy. This remains the #1 unresolved failure signature fleet-wide; root cause is still opaque because the CLI step emits no stderr/exit-code diagnostics.safe-output-partial-failure-intolerance (recurrence #9, open since ~2026-05) — 7 runs where the
agentjob succeeded but thesafe_outputsjob failed at "Process Safe Outputs," reddening an otherwise-successful run. Smoke Copilot was fully red (0/3) (e.g. §30716152552); also hit Smoke Codex, PR Sous Chef, Code Scanning Fixer. Confirmed not a GitHub API rate-limit issue (core_remainingstayed 11.2K–15.0K of 15K throughout). Smallest actionable fix: make the safe_outputs job tolerate partial item failures instead of reddening the whole job for one bad item.Novel signature — Contribution Check evals-install failure (1 run, watch only)
§30693860813 — Contribution Check's evals job (distinct from the agent job) failed at "Install GitHub Copilot CLI." This is a CLI-installation failure, not the familiar Execute-CLI-crash-after-install signature. Only one instance observed — logged as a new known issue to watch for recurrence, not yet treated as a cluster.
Positive signals
Three previously-chronic issues showed zero recurrence today: the AOAI apikey/Entra transient-error loop (6/6 success), the chroot-node-not-available issue on Daily Issues Report Generator (1/1 success), and the codex-gh-aw-binary-not-found issue on Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer (1/1 success). Only one clean day of evidence after the audit gap, so none are marked RESOLVED — worth confirming at the next audit.
Anomalies
agenticworkflows status, so this isn't a removed workflow — it's ambiguous whether the underlying issue was fixed and no qualifying push fired, or whether the trigger itself stopped. Flagged as a watch item, not a confirmed fix.Recommendations filed this audit
Trend charts
Workflow Health — Runs & Success Rate
Success/failure counts and rate across ~7 weeks of audit history, with the 07-07..07-31 gap left unbridged. Today's 92.5% sits comfortably above the 90% reference line and close to the pre-gap baseline (86.25% on 07-06), suggesting no major regression occurred during the unaudited period — though that can't be confirmed without daily data. The isolated marker on 08-01 (rather than a connecting line from 07-06) is intentional: it reflects that this is a single new observation after a long silent stretch, not a continuous trend.
Token Usage — Daily & Moving Average
Daily token totals plotted against a 3-audit moving average computed only over days with observed data (many days in this history have null token counts — a known, separately-tracked reporting gap). Today's 18.5M tokens is on the higher end of the observed range, but with so few surrounding data points the moving average should be read cautiously rather than as a firm trend.
Next actions
References:
All reactions