You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
10 GitHub MCP tools tested across 10 toolsets. Total: 7,525 tokens, average usefulness 3.6/5. Best: github_context and list_pull_requests (5/5). Worst: get_teams (1/5, blocked by permissions again).
Notable finding: the mcpscriptslist_workflows wrapper correctly honored perPage=1 today (1 of 351 workflows returned, 180 tokens) — a clear improvement over the raw GitHub MCP list_workflows tool tested 2026-08-04, which ignored per_page and returned 30 of 347 workflows (2,200 tokens).
Tools needing improvement: get_file_contents (needs excerpt/range support for large files), list_label (needs perPage/filter support — currently always returns the full 841-label set), get_teams (permission friction — consider granting or documenting as unavailable)
Context-heavy tools: get_file_contents (4,200 tokens), list_label (2,600 tokens) — both toolsets lack pagination/filtering controls that would let agents request less data
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
MCP Structural Analysis — 2026-08-05
10 GitHub MCP tools tested across 10 toolsets. Total: 7,525 tokens, average usefulness 3.6/5. Best:
github_contextandlist_pull_requests(5/5). Worst:get_teams(1/5, blocked by permissions again).Notable finding: the
mcpscriptslist_workflowswrapper correctly honoredperPage=1today (1 of 351 workflows returned, 180 tokens) — a clear improvement over the raw GitHub MCPlist_workflowstool tested 2026-08-04, which ignoredper_pageand returned 30 of 347 workflows (2,200 tokens).Full Structural Analysis Report
Executive Summary
github_context/list_pull_requests: 5/5get_teams: 1/5Usefulness Ratings for Agentic Work
Schema Analysis
Response Size Analysis
Tool-by-Tool Analysis
30-Day Trend Summary
Recommendations
github_context,list_pull_requests,list_workflows(via mcpscripts wrapper),list_code_scanning_alerts,list_discussions,search_codeget_file_contents(needs excerpt/range support for large files),list_label(needs perPage/filter support — currently always returns the full 841-label set),get_teams(permission friction — consider granting or documenting as unavailable)github_context(80 tokens, 5/5),list_pull_requests(40 tokens, 5/5),list_workflowsvia mcpscripts wrapper (180 tokens, 5/5)get_file_contents(4,200 tokens),list_label(2,600 tokens) — both toolsets lack pagination/filtering controls that would let agents request less dataVisualizations
Response Size by Toolset
Usefulness Ratings
Daily Token Trend
Size vs Usefulness
All reactions