[safe-output-health] Safe Output Health Report - 2026-08-07: 0 failures across 169 runs #51001
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-08-08T05:03:24.866Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Executive Summary
Safe Output Health: 🟢 Healthy — 0 failures
Audited 200 agentic workflow runs from the last 24 hours (2026-08-06 → 2026-08-07). 169 runs included a
safe_outputsjob (the single consolidated job that processes all safe-output types — create_discussion, create_issue, add_comment, create_pull_request, create_pull_request_review_comment, update_issue, add_labels, push_to_pull_request_branch, etc.). Every one of the 169safe_outputsjob executions completed successfully — a 100% success rate, 0 failures, 0 missing_tool events, 0 missing_data events.This is the first audit run for this monitor — there is no prior history in cache memory to compare trends against. This report establishes the baseline.
Out of scope, and therefore not analyzed here: the raw log summary shows 68 total errors and 30
driver_exitfailures across the 200 runs, but every one of these traces to the agent job (engine CLI crashes/exits), not to safe-output processing. Agent-job and detection-job failures are monitored by other specialized workflows.Safe Output Job Statistics
safe_outputsjobsafe_outputsjob failuressafe_outputsjob success ratemissing_tooleventsmissing_dataeventsItems processed by type:
Error Clusters
No error clusters found. Zero
safe_outputsjob failures were observed across the audit window. No API errors, parsing errors, validation errors, permission errors, network errors, or logic errors were attributable to safe-output processing.Details on the 68 raw errors / 30 driver_exit failures (out of scope)
The bulk log summary for this window reports
total_errors: 68andtotal_driver_exit_failures: 30. Verification (multiline pattern match across everyrun_summary.json, searching specifically for asafe_outputsjob entry followed by afailureconclusion) returned zero matches. A broader search for any"conclusion": "failure"across all 200 runs' job details confirmed every failure instance is attached to theagentjob (specifically itsExecute <engine> CLIstep) — i.e., the underlying agent/model driver exiting non-zero — not to thesafe_outputsjob. These are explicitly out of scope for this monitor and are covered by other agent-health workflows.Root Cause Analysis
Not applicable this period — no safe-output failures to root-cause. The architecture itself is worth noting for future audits: safe-output processing is consolidated into a single
safe_outputsjob per run (not per-type jobs), so a single job failure would affect all safe-output types emitted by that run simultaneously. This is an architectural fact to keep in mind if failures do appear in future audits — one badsafe_outputsjob conclusion can mean multiple item types were blocked at once.Recommendations
Work Item Plans
No work items required this period.
Historical Context
This is the first audit performed by this monitor (cache memory at
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/safe-output-health/was empty prior to this run). Baseline data has been stored for future trend comparisons:2026-08-07.json— full daily summaryindex.json— master audit indexerror-patterns.json,recurring-failures.json,solutions.json— initialized empty, ready to accumulate data as issues ariseMetrics / KPIs
Next Steps
safe_outputsjob failure appears in a future run, capture the job step name, error message, and safe-output type(s) affected, then categorize intoerror-patterns.json.driver_exitfailures (68 errors / 30 driver_exit) — flagged for the agent-health monitor, out of scope here.References:
All reactions