[safe-output-health] Safe Output Health Report - 2026-08-09

[github-actions[bot]]

🏥 Safe Output Health Report - 2026-08-09

Executive Summary

• Period: Last 24 hours (2026-08-08 ~04:00 UTC → 2026-08-09 ~04:37 UTC)
• Runs Analyzed: 201
• Workflows Active: Spanning 9 engines — Copilot (84), pi (69), Claude (32), Codex (8), Kiro (2), Aider (2), Crush (1), Goose (1), OpenCode (1)
• Safe Output Jobs Executed: 201 (safe_outputs job ran in every workflow run)
• Safe Output Jobs Failed: 0
• Error Clusters Identified: 0

Bottom line: clean bill of health. Every safe_outputs job in the last 24 hours completed with success or an intentional skipped conclusion — no failures, no API errors, no parsing errors, no permission errors.

Safe Output Job Statistics

Job Type	Total Executions	Failures	Success Rate
safe_outputs (consolidated processor)	201	0	100%
push_repo_memory	12	0	100%
push_evals_state	149	0	100%
push_experiments_state	28	0	100%
update_cache_memory	36	0	100%
upload_assets	7	0	100%
unlock	5	0	100%

Note: in this repository's compiled workflow architecture, all safe-output types (create_issue, add_comment, create_discussion, create_pull_request, etc.) are funneled through a single consolidated safe_outputs job per run, rather than one job per output type. Breakdown of the items that job actually produced:

Safe Output Item Type	Approx. Count Across 24h
add_comment	74
create_pull_request_review_comment	42
create_issue	58
submit_pull_request_review	40
update_pull_request	24
create_discussion	17
assign_to_agent	12
add_labels	12
push_to_pull_request_branch	5
create_pull_request	2
close_discussion	1

~287 safe-output items were successfully produced/processed across 127 of the 201 runs (the other 74 runs had nothing to emit, and the safe_outputs job for those either no-op'd successfully or was skipped as designed).

Error Clusters

None. A full sweep of every run's run_summary.json job_details for the safe_outputs job (and the related write-back jobs push_repo_memory, push_evals_state, push_experiments_state, update_cache_memory, upload_assets, unlock) across all 201 runs found zero non-success, non-skipped conclusions.

Root Cause Analysis

Not applicable this cycle — no failures to analyze in the safe-output pipeline.

Out-of-scope note (agent job failures, not analyzed in depth here)

The raw run data does show total_errors: 10, all classified as failure_kind: "driver_exit" on the agent job (not safe_outputs). Per this monitor's scope, agent-job and detection-job failures are explicitly excluded — they're covered by other monitoring workflows. Flagging only for completeness: these 10 agent-job failures did not cascade into any safe-output job failures (in every case, the downstream safe_outputs/conclusion jobs still completed successfully, since safe-outputs processing is designed to run/skip gracefully off of whatever the agent did produce).

Recommendations

Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)

None identified.

Bug Fixes Required

None identified.

Configuration Changes

None recommended — current safe-output pipeline configuration is performing reliably at 100% success across a high-volume, multi-engine day (201 runs, ~287 items, 9 different agent engines).

Process Improvements

1. Job-level log granularity
   • Current State: The downloaded log bundles include run_summary.json with per-job conclusions but no raw step-by-step text logs for the safe_outputs job body (no create_discussion.txt-style per-type log as older tooling assumed).
   • Proposed: If/when a safe_outputs job failure does occur, ensure the raw step output for "Process Safe Outputs" and "Upload Safe Outputs Items" steps remains easily fetchable (e.g., via gh run view --log or an equivalent MCP log-fetch path) so root-causing a real failure doesn't require re-deriving it purely from run_summary.json conclusions.

Work Item Plans

No work items are needed this cycle — there is nothing to fix. Recommend re-running this audit daily to catch regressions early, given the pipeline currently produces meaningful volume (287 items/day) with zero failures.

Historical Context

This is the first recorded Safe Output Health audit in cache memory (/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/safe-output-health/) — no prior baseline exists for trend comparison. Today's 100% success rate across 201 runs establishes the baseline going forward.

Trends

• Error rate trend: N/A (first audit)
• Most common recurring issue: none
• Improvement since last audit: N/A (first audit)

Metrics and KPIs

• Overall Safe Output Success Rate: 100%
• Most Reliable Job Type: All safe-output-related jobs tied at 100% (safe_outputs, push_repo_memory, push_evals_state, push_experiments_state, update_cache_memory, upload_assets, unlock)
• Most Problematic Job Type: None — no failures recorded
• Average Time to Failure: N/A — no failures occurred

Next Steps

• Establish cache-memory baseline for future trend comparisons
• Re-run this audit daily to confirm the 100% success rate holds
• If a future audit finds a safe_outputs failure, prioritize fetching the raw "Process Safe Outputs" step log for that run to root-cause before creating a work item
• Consider a lightweight cross-link with the agent-job failure monitor, since 10 agent-job driver_exit failures occurred today (out of scope here, but worth confirming the other monitor caught them)

Generated by 🔒 Safe Output Health Monitor · agent · 237.9 AIC · ⌖ 16 AIC · ⊞ 9.9K · ◷

• expires on Aug 9, 2026, 8:52 PM UTC-08:00

[github-actions[bot]]

This discussion has been marked as outdated by Safe Output Health Monitor.

A newer discussion is available at Discussion #51688.