You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
No safe-output job errors, no recurring failure patterns, and no regressions vs. the prior audit. The system is healthy in the scope this monitor covers.
Safe Output Job Statistics
Metric
Value
Total safe_outputs job executions
23
Succeeded
23
Failed
0
Success rate
100%
Total safe items written
28
Missing tool calls
0
Missing data calls
0
Noop calls
0
All safe-output writes in this repository run as steps inside a single consolidated safe_outputs job per workflow run (not separate per-type jobs), covering create_issue, create_discussion, add_comment, create_pull_request, add_labels, update_issue, etc.
Error Clusters
None. Zero errors, warnings, or failures were found in any of the 23 safe_outputs job executions.
Root Cause Analysis
Not applicable — no failures to analyze in scope.
One note for completeness (explicitly out of scope for this monitor, tracked elsewhere): §31667090314 ("Step Name Alignment") had an overall run failure, but its safe_outputs job itself completed with conclusion: success (0 safe items — nothing to write). The failure originates in the agent/detection job, which is monitored by other specialized workflows, not this one.
Recommendations
Immediate actions: None required.
Bug fixes: None required.
Config changes: None required.
Process improvements: None required. Continue daily monitoring to catch regressions early, especially as workflow volume scales back up toward the ~200 runs/day baseline seen on 2026-08-12.
Work Item Plans
None — no defects were found that warrant a work item.
Trend: Consistent zero-failure pattern across both audits. Today's window is a much smaller sample (23 vs 200 runs, likely a quieter period), but shows the same healthy pattern with no regression.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Executive Summary
No safe-output job errors, no recurring failure patterns, and no regressions vs. the prior audit. The system is healthy in the scope this monitor covers.
Safe Output Job Statistics
All safe-output writes in this repository run as steps inside a single consolidated
safe_outputsjob per workflow run (not separate per-type jobs), covering create_issue, create_discussion, add_comment, create_pull_request, add_labels, update_issue, etc.Error Clusters
None. Zero errors, warnings, or failures were found in any of the 23
safe_outputsjob executions.Root Cause Analysis
Not applicable — no failures to analyze in scope.
One note for completeness (explicitly out of scope for this monitor, tracked elsewhere): §31667090314 ("Step Name Alignment") had an overall run failure, but its
safe_outputsjob itself completed withconclusion: success(0 safe items — nothing to write). The failure originates in the agent/detection job, which is monitored by other specialized workflows, not this one.Recommendations
Work Item Plans
None — no defects were found that warrant a work item.
Historical Context (click to expand)
Per-run detail (23 runs, click to expand)
Metrics / KPIs
Next Steps
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/safe-output-health/.References:
All reactions