[detection-analysis] Detection Analysis Report — 2026-08-24 #55538
Closed
Replies: 2 comments
|
👋 Just a smoke test bot passing through — dropping a haiku for the occasion: Copilot runs deep, Carry on, humans! 🤖 Warning Firewall blocked 6 domainsThe following domains were blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
To allow these domains, add them to the network:
allowed:
- defaults
- "accounts.google.com"
- "android.clients.google.com"
- "clients2.google.com"
- "contentautofill.googleapis.com"
- "www.google.com"
- "www.gstatic.com"See Network Configuration for more information.
|
0 replies
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Detection Analysis Report. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #55895. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
gh-aw-detection: false): 4 (1.5%)Note
No misconfigured workflows were detected in this window. All three misconfiguration rules (persistent opt-out on high-volume workflows, failing detection jobs, flapping detection settings) came back clean.
Comparison Chart
Detection-enabled runs had a higher success rate (84.41%) than the small sample of regular runs (75.0%), and averaged far more tokens per run (41,171 vs 14,225) — consistent with detection-enabled workflows skewing toward larger, more complex agentic tasks (e.g.
Ponytail Reviewer,Daily Project Performance Summary Generatorat 1M+ tokens) versus the 4 regular runs, which were all lightweight smoke tests.Misconfigured Workflows
No misconfigured workflows detected in this window.
View All Run Metrics
Regular runs (
gh-aw-detection: false) — 4 total, none exceed the >3-runs-per-workflow threshold for flagging (each of the 4 belongs to a distinct workflow):Detection-enabled runs — 263 total across 66 workflows. Highest-volume workflows:
PR Sous Chef(31 runs, 96.8% success),PR Code Quality Reviewer(25 runs, 100%),Design Decision Gate(25 runs, 84.0%),Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer(26 runs, 100%),Impeccable Skills Reviewer(23 runs, 100%),Test Quality Sentinel(22 runs, 100%),Ponytail Reviewer(24 runs, 58.3% — lowest success rate among high-volume workflows, worth a closer look independent of the detection feature itself).All 264 detection-job invocations completed with
conclusion: success— no detection-step failures were found in this window.View Historical Trend
Two-day trend (only 2 data points so far — trending will sharpen as more days accumulate):
Both cohorts' success rates and detection run volume declined day-over-day; regular-run volume dropped sharply (37 → 4). One day of data is too little to call this a trend rather than noise — worth revisiting after a few more snapshots.
Recommendations
detectionjob itself is healthy everywhere it ran.gh-aw-detection: falseruns are all one-off smoke-test workflows (Smoke Copilot,Smoke Claude,Smoke Copilot Sub Agents), which is a reasonable, low-risk use of the opt-out — no action needed unless their run volume grows past the 3-run threshold.Ponytail Reviewerhad the lowest success rate (58.3%) among high-volume workflows and by far the highest average token usage (182K) — unrelated to the detection feature, but worth a separate investigation given the resource cost of its failures.References:
All reactions