[security-observability] Daily Security Observability Report — 2026-08-28 #56687
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Security Observability Report. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #56917. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Executive Summary
This report combines two security signals over the last 7 days: firewall traffic analysis across 90 firewall-enabled workflow runs (61 unique workflows) and DIFC integrity-filtered event analysis for tool-call filtering. The vast majority of network traffic was benign — 5,125 requests allowed vs. 634 blocked (an ~11% block rate) — with most blocks concentrated in a handful of high-volume workflows performing package/dependency management (
PureLock,CI Optimization Coach,Deep Report,Daily Go Test Parallelizer).The top blocked domains are largely GitHub API and Go module proxy endpoints (
api.github.com,proxy.golang.org,github.com), suggesting these workflows are hitting network egress restrictions during legitimate operations (API pagination, module fetching) rather than malicious activity. A long tail of ~80 domains was blocked exactly once each, almost entirely from a single run of theDeep Reportworkflow attempting broad package-manager and CA/OCSP connectivity — consistent with an overly restrictive allowlist for that workflow's toolchain rather than a security incident.No DIFC integrity-filtered events were recorded in the last 7 days, indicating no tool calls were blocked by the Data Integrity and Flow Control system during this window — no runs matched the DIFC monitoring criteria, so this signal is clean with nothing to tune.
🔥 Firewall Analysis
Key Firewall Metrics
📈 Firewall Request Trends
All analyzed runs fall within a single day (2026-08-28), so the chart shows hourly granularity. A pronounced spike in blocked requests occurs between 16:00–17:00 (407 and 149 blocked requests respectively), coinciding with the highest overall traffic volume of the day — most likely a batch of scheduled workflows (Go/dependency-heavy jobs) running concurrently. Outside this window, block volume stays low and steady (single digits to low tens per hour).
Top Blocked Domains
api.github.com(264 blocks) andproxy.golang.org(134 blocks) dominate, both from routine GitHub API and Go module operations rather than suspicious destinations.chatgpt.com/ab.chatgpt.comblocks (42 combined) appear across several AI-moderation-related workflows, likely blocked telemetry/tracking endpoints rather than intentional egress. No domains in the top 15 suggest malicious intent — this looks like firewall policy friction on legitimate developer tooling.Most Frequently Blocked Domains
View Detailed Request Patterns by Workflow
View Complete Blocked Domains List
api.github.com:443(264),proxy.golang.org:443(134),github.com:443(77),chatgpt.com:443(27),(unknown)(19),ab.chatgpt.com:443(15),api.anthropic.com:443(13),raw.githubusercontent.com:443(7), and 78 additional domains blocked exactly once each (predominantly package-manager, OCSP/CRL certificate-validation, and Python/Node/Go tooling endpoints triggered by a singleDeep Reportrun):*.grafana.net,*.pythonhosted.org,*.sentry.io,anaconda.org,api.anthropic.com,api.npms.io,api.snapcraft.io,archive.ubuntu.com,awmg-cli-proxy,awmg-mcpg,azure.archive.ubuntu.com,binstar.org,bootstrap.pypa.io,bun.sh,cdn.jsdelivr.net,conda.anaconda.org,conda.binstar.org,crl.geotrust.com,crl.globalsign.com,crl.identrust.com,crl.sectigo.com,crl.thawte.com,crl.usertrust.com,crl.verisign.com,crl3.digicert.com,crl4.digicert.com,crls.ssl.com,deb.nodesource.com,deno.land,esm.sh,files.pythonhosted.org,get.pnpm.io,googleapis.deno.dev,googlechromelabs.github.io,json-schema.org,json.schemastore.org,jsr.io,keyserver.ubuntu.com,nodejs.org,npm.pkg.github.com,npmjs.com,npmjs.org,ocsp.digicert.com,ocsp.geotrust.com,ocsp.globalsign.com,ocsp.identrust.com,ocsp.sectigo.com,ocsp.ssl.com,ocsp.thawte.com,ocsp.usertrust.com,ocsp.verisign.com,packagecloud.io,packages.cloud.google.com,packages.microsoft.com,pip.pypa.io,ppa.launchpad.net,pypi.org,pypi.python.org,registry.bower.io,registry.npmjs.com,registry.npmjs.org,registry.yarnpkg.com,repo.anaconda.com,repo.continuum.io,repo.yarnpkg.com,s.symcb.com,s.symcd.com,security.ubuntu.com,skimdb.npmjs.com,storage.googleapis.com,telemetry.vercel.com,ts-crl.ws.symantec.com,ts-ocsp.ws.symantec.com,www.googleapis.com,www.npmjs.com,www.npmjs.org,yarnpkg.com.🔒 Firewall Security Recommendations
Deep Reportegress needs — this single run generated ~80 unique single-hit blocked domains spanning npm, pip, conda, apt, and CA/OCSP validation endpoints. If this workflow legitimately needs broad package-manager access, consider an explicit allowlist bundle for its toolchain rather than relying on default deny; if not, confirm the blocks are intentional and not masking a misconfigured dependency step.api.github.com/github.comblock volume inPureLock,Ponytail Reviewer, andDaily Go Test Parallelizer— high block counts (247, 35, 69 total blocked requests respectively) against core GitHub endpoints may indicate rate-limiting-driven retries or overly narrow API scoping rather than a security concern; verify these workflows aren't failing silently due to blocked calls.(unknown)domain classification (19 blocks across 17 workflows) — these are likely DNS resolution failures or non-HTTP egress; add logging/labeling improvements to the firewall proxy to identify what's actually being requested.policy_analysiswas present in some audits but contained norule_hits, so rule-level attribution isn't currently possible. Consider verifying the firewall proxy configuration to ensure rule-hit logging is enabled for future audits.🔒 DIFC Integrity Analysis
No DIFC integrity-filtered events found in the last 7 days. The DIFC data source (
/tmp/gh-aw/agent/integrity/filtered-logs.json) returned zero runs, and the warm-start cache snapshot (/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/security-observability/filtered-logs.snapshot.json) confirms no filtered events in the prior period either. No tool calls were blocked by the Data Integrity and Flow Control system during this window — this is a clean signal with nothing to chart or tune.Generated by the Daily Security Observability workflow (consolidated from Daily Firewall Reporter + Daily DIFC Analyzer)
Analysis window: Last 7 days | Repository: github/gh-aw
Run: https://github.com/github/gh-aw/actions/runs/33205444385
All reactions