π₯ Organization Health Report β 2026-08-31 #57397
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-09-01T08:49:42.818Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
github org, public non-archived repos β activity is heavily concentrated in
gh-awand its satellite repos (gh-aw-mcpg,gh-aw-firewall), driven almost entirely by automated agentic workflows (github-actions[bot],Copilot,dependabot[bot]) rather than direct human authorship.π Volume Metrics
Overall Status (org:github, public repos, current snapshot)
Recent Activity (created in last 30 days, sampled via search)
π Top 5 Most Active Repositories (last 30 days)
gh-awdominates activity by a wide margin β it's the primary development surface, generating most of the issues (largely automated agent run trackers) and PRs.gh-aw-firewallhas an outsized comment count relative to its issue/PR volume, suggesting active discussion on a small number of items (worth checking for contentious or complex PRs).Top 10 Most Active Authors
Only 4 distinct authors appear in the 30-day sample; nearly all activity is bot/agent-driven (automated workflow run trackers, Copilot-authored PRs, Dependabot updates). Human-authored activity (
csmlo) is minimal in this window.π₯ High-Activity Unresolved Items
Hot Issues (Need Attention)
No open PRs surfaced with notable comment counts in this sample β recent PRs are being merged/closed quickly (51 of 66 opened in the window are already closed).
The 10 stale open PRs are the most actionable item here β worth a manual sweep to close, rebase, or merge them since PR throughput is otherwise very high (91 closed vs 25 open).
π‘ Commentary and Recommendations
github-actions[bot],Copilot,dependabot[bot]). Human-authored issues/PRs are rare in this sample β consider whether automated issue trackers that auto-close on success are cluttering signal for genuine problems.gh-aw-firewall's comment-heavy but PR/issue-light profile suggests concentrated discussion β worth spot-checking whether decisions there are being tracked/resolved.Full Data and Methodology
Data Collection
gh api search/repositoriesis:open/is:closedsearch countsMethodology
gh api search/issuesandgh api search/repositories(GitHub Search API), no MCP server available in this run.org:githubreturned complete result sets (88 and 66 items respectively, both under the 100-item cap), so no sampling bias from pagination was introduced.issues*2 + prs*3 + comments*0.5(repos),issues*2 + prs*3(authors).Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
api.github.com[!TIP]
api.github.comis blocked because GitHub API access uses the built-in GitHub tools by default. Instead of addingapi.github.comtonetwork.allowed, usetools.github.mode: gh-proxyfor direct pre-authenticated GitHub CLI access without requiring network access toapi.github.com:See GitHub Tools for more information on
gh-proxymode.To allow these domains, add them to the
network.allowedlist in your workflow frontmatter:See Network Configuration for more information.
All reactions