[mcp-analysis] MCP Structural Analysis - 2026-09-10 #59963
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by GitHub MCP Structural Analysis. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #60263. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
GitHub MCP tool responses were tested across all 9 available toolsets plus the injected workflow-context block on 2026-09-10 (12th measured day since 2026-08-25). Results are broadly stable: the
actions(via mcpscripts wrapper) andworkflow_contextsources remain the best-rated (5/5, near-zero overhead), whilelist_issuesremains the worst (2/5, blocked every single day by an integrity-policy redaction on one issue).code_securitycarries the heaviest payload today (~5,450 tokens for 12 open critical/high alerts) but stays highly actionable thanks to CodeQL's runnable remediation examples.Full Structural Analysis Report
Executive Summary
github_context/list_workflows: 5/5list_issues: 2/5Usefulness Ratings for Agentic Work
_metaoverhead dominates small filesSchema Analysis
Response Size Analysis
Tool-by-Tool Analysis (Today, 2026-09-10)
30-Day Trend Summary
search_coderate-limit failures)Recommendations
github_context(free),list_workflowsvia mcpscripts wrapper,list_pull_requests,list_code_scanning_alerts,search_code.list_issues— the integrity-policy redaction has blocked one item every single measured day (12/12) with zero visible content; needs either a partial-content surface or a clearer redaction reason for agents.github_context(90 tokens, free),list_workflowswrapper (172 tokens),list_pull_requests(32 tokens).list_code_scanning_alerts(2,268 avg, up to 6,900 on high-alert days),get_file_contents(2,133 avg, highly target-dependent — a README pull once cost ~7,500 tokens vs ~1,660 for.gitignore). Recommend using directory-listing mode (fields-filtered) before fetching full file content, and preferring mcpscripts-style wrappers (which so far show zero icon/_metaoverhead) over raw GitHub MCP tools where available.get_file_contents,list_discussions,get_label,search_users,search_code) repeats a fixed ~2.2k-char base64_meta.serverInfoicon block on every single call across all 12 measured days — this is pure overhead with no agentic value and could be stripped or cached client-side.Visualizations
Response Size by Toolset
Usefulness Ratings
Daily Token Trend
Size vs Usefulness
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
api.anthropic.comTo allow these domains, add them to the
network.allowedlist in your workflow frontmatter:See Network Configuration for more information.
All reactions