Daily Firewall Report2026-09-27 #63758
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Firewall Logs Collector and Reporter. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #64154. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🔥 Executive Summary
Report date: 2026-09-27 (covering the last 24 hours)
This report analyzes firewall activity across 87 workflows (201 workflow runs) that had the firewall feature enabled during the period. Out of 304 total run directories cached locally, 88 had no
run_summary.jsonfile present and were skipped (not malformed — simply absent).Overall, network activity was overwhelmingly clean: of 13,921 total monitored requests, only 10 were blocked (a 0.07% block rate), spread across just 2 unique domains. This indicates the current firewall allowlists are well-tuned to the workflows' actual needs, with only minor incidental noise from background OS/browser telemetry domains.
📊 Key Metrics
🚫 Top Blocked Domains
Section 4: Policy Rule Attribution
Not available this cycle — the cached
run_summary.jsonfiles for this period do not include apolicy_analysisfield (no rule-level hit counts, SSL Bump/DLP status, or explicit rule attribution for denies). All denial data available is limited to the domain-levelfirewall_analysis.requests_by_domainbreakdown shown above and in the details below.View Detailed Request Patterns by Workflow
Workflow: Daily Model Inventory Checker (1 run with a block)
Workflow: Smoke Claude (1 run with blocks)
Workflow: Smoke Copilot - AOAI (apikey) (1 run with a block)
Workflow: Smoke Agent: scoped/approved (1 run with blocks)
Workflow: Smoke Copilot ARM64 (1 run with a block)
Workflow: Smoke Copilot (1 run with a block)
View Complete Blocked Domains List
🔐 Security Recommendations
clients2.google.comis a well-known Google Chrome/ChromeOS component-update check-in domain, likely triggered incidentally by a headless browser or system process during CI (e.g. Playwright/Chromium-based tooling). It carries low security risk but appears repeatedly across many unrelated "Smoke" workflows and the "Daily Model Inventory Checker." If none of these workflows intentionally use Chrome update services, no allowlisting action is needed — the block is working as intended and this traffic is expected background noise from bundled browser binaries.host.docker.internal:4173appearing only in "Smoke Agent: scoped/approved" suggests a local container is attempting to call back to a host-side service (port 4173 is the default Vite preview server port). This looks like an intentional local dev/test dependency that may need to be added to that workflow'snetwork.allowedlist if the smoke test expects to reach a locally-served preview app; otherwise, this is likely a leftover config that should be removed from the test setup.policy_analysis) data was absent from all cached summaries this period. To enable Section 4 rule-level attribution and rule-effectiveness analysis (busiest allow rules, deny rules catching the most traffic, unused rules), ensure the firewall log collector captures and persists policy rule hit counts and per-request rule attribution in future runs.firewall-chart-generatoragent configuration/model availability before the next scheduled run so trend visualizations can resume.All reactions