Repository navigation
[uk ai resilience] [uk-ai-resilience] Governance report 2026-10-01 #64794
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by UK AI Operational Resilience. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #65050. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Executive summary
Window: 2026-09-24 → 2026-10-01 (7d). 106 commits (28 security-signal), 69 open security issues, 277 open code-scanning alerts, 0 secret-scanning alerts. Sub-agent dispatch was not used; analysis was done directly from the pre-computed inputs (limitation: lower confidence on commit-level detail).
Key finding: every non-trivial open alert class already has an open
[uk-ai-resilience]tracking issue, so no new issues were created (duplicate rule). The main risk is remediation velocity: alerts persist and recur rather than being untracked.Asset graph summary
Asset graph (recent-change scoped)
.github/workflows(CI install steps)pkg/workflow(compiler, MCP config)pkg/cliscripts/Ownership signal: no
.github/CODEOWNERSexists (#61637 open).Tier classification
Tier table
Control verification gaps
Risk scoring
Scores (1 low risk – 5 high risk; ownership confidence inverted)
Remediation queue
Exception register
None granted. No permanent exceptions are recommended.
Operational metrics baseline
All reactions