[Auto-Triage] Auto-Triage Issues Report

[github-actions[bot]]

🏷️ Auto-Triage Issues Report Summary

Date: 2026-10-04

Processed 10 previously unlabeled issues. Safe outputs accepted 13 label assignments for downstream application. Both pre-fetched issue lists were empty; issues were discovered through the fallback search.

Key Metrics

• Label submissions accepted: 10/10 (100%).
• Classification confidence: High.
• Distribution: report 4, automation 5, enhancement 1, compiler 1, mcp 1, safe-outputs 1.
• Human review flags: 0.
• Remaining unlabeled issues: unknown. Search responses withheld items under the integrity policy; those items were not inspected or classified. The repository-wide percentage cannot be established from this run.

Classification Summary

Issue	Labels submitted	Confidence	Reasoning
#65497	report	High	Generated research report with workflow prefix and generation marker.
#65264	report	High	Generated model-resolution audit with workflow marker.
#65044	report	High	Workflow-prefixed optimization analysis with generation marker.
#65000	report	High	Generated aggregate AIC usage audit with workflow marker.
#65427	automation	High	Bot-created workflow progress tracker.
#65284	automation	High	Bot-created workflow progress tracker.
#65145	automation	High	Bot-created workflow progress tracker.
#65101	automation	High	Bot-created workflow progress tracker.
#64964	automation	High	Bot-created workflow progress tracker.
#64852	enhancement, compiler, mcp, safe-outputs	High	Requests a new compiler-aware coordinator with MCP API and safe-output arbitration.

Next Actions

Label generated reports and progress trackers at creation to reduce recurring triage workload. Continue remaining eligible issues on the next pass; this run reached the 10-operation limit.

References: §37227650328

Generated by 🔧 Auto-Triage Issues · codex · gpt60 · 64 AIC · ⌖ 37.2 AIC · ⊞ 19.1K · ◷

• expires on Oct 5, 2026, 11:20 AM UTC-08:00

[github-actions[bot]]

This discussion has been marked as outdated by Auto-Triage Issues.

A newer discussion is available at Discussion #65723.