[observability] Observability Coverage Report - 2026-10-06

[github-actions[bot]]

Executive Summary

This report analyzed a representative capped set of 20 recent workflow runs from the repository-wide logs fetch (count: 30, last 7 days). The fetched sample is currently a narrow time slice (about 1 hour on 2026-10-06), as indicated by the logs tool partial-result warning, so findings reflect current-day run behavior rather than a full-week distribution.

Within the 20-run cap, none of the analyzed runs showed AWF firewall enablement or MCP gateway usage based on discovered artifacts and recursive file checks under each run-<id>/ directory. As a result, no firewall access.log or MCP telemetry files (gateway.jsonl / rpc-messages.jsonl) were expected for this sampled set.

Overall observability health for the sampled set is stable for non-firewall/non-MCP runs, but coverage for the targeted components cannot be established from this slice because no qualifying runs were present. No critical missing-log incidents were detected in qualifying runs (there were zero qualifying runs).

Key Alerts and Anomalies

No critical issues detected in qualifying firewall-enabled or MCP-enabled runs (none found in the analyzed sample).

🔴 Critical Issues:

• None in qualifying runs (no firewall-enabled runs and no MCP-enabled runs in this analyzed set).

⚠️ Warnings:

• Sample representativeness warning: initial repository-wide fetch returned partial results and covered only a narrow recent window (~1 hour), not the full 7-day span.
• Several runs in the sample were still in_progress/pending, so artifact sets may still evolve post-analysis.

Coverage Summary

Component	Runs Analyzed	Logs Present	Coverage	Status
AWF Firewall (access.log)	0 (firewall_enabled_workflows)	0	N/A	i️
MCP Gateway (gateway.jsonl or rpc-messages.jsonl)	0 (mcp_enabled_workflows)	0	N/A	i️

📋 Detailed Run Analysis

Firewall-Enabled Runs

Workflow	Run ID	access.log	Entries	Allowed	Blocked	Status
N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	i️

Missing Firewall Logs (access.log)

Workflow	Run ID	Date	Link
None	-	-	-

MCP-Enabled Runs

Workflow	Run ID	Telemetry Source	Entries	Servers	Tool Calls	Errors	Status
N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	i️

Missing MCP Telemetry (no gateway.jsonl or rpc-messages.jsonl)

Workflow	Run ID	Date	Link
None	-	-	-

🔍 Telemetry Quality Analysis

Firewall Log Quality

• Total access.log entries analyzed: 0
• Domains accessed: 0 unique
• Blocked requests: 0
• Most accessed domains: N/A

Gateway Log Quality

• Telemetry source: N/A (no MCP-enabled runs in analyzed sample)
• Total entries analyzed: 0
• MCP servers used: none
• Total tool calls: 0
• Error rate: N/A
• Average response time: N/A

Healthy Runs Summary

• 20/20 sampled runs had no indication of firewall/MCP component usage, so component-specific observability checks were not applicable.

Recommended Actions

1. Add a targeted daily follow-up fetch for known firewall-enabled and MCP-enabled workflows when the initial broad sample contains zero qualifying runs.
2. Prioritize completed failed/cancelled runs in that follow-up to maximize debugging-signal validation under the same 20-run cap.
3. Add an explicit report field for representativeness (time-span covered vs requested window) so N/A coverage states are clearly interpreted.

📊 Historical Trends

Historical trend data is not included in this single-sample run output.

---

Report generated automatically by the Daily Observability Report workflow
Analysis window: Last 7 days | Runs analyzed: 20

Generated by 📊 Daily Observability Report for AWF Firewall and MCP Gateway · codex · gpt53codex · 12.5 AIC · ⌖ 5.17 AIC · ⊞ 15.4K · ◷

• expires on Oct 7, 2026, 3:51 PM UTC-08:00

[github-actions[bot]]

This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-10-07T23:51:21.661Z.

Closed by Workflow