Repository navigation
[uk ai resilience] [uk-ai-resilience] Governance report - 2026-10-08 #66932
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by UK AI Operational Resilience. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #67226. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Executive summary
7-day window (since 2026-10-01): 330 commits (173 Copilot, 79 maintainer, 24 dependabot), 248 open code-scanning alerts, 0 secret-scanning alerts, 44 open security-labelled issues. Most risk is concentrated in compiled workflows (
*.lock.yml) and new automation scripts. Most themes already have open tracking issues. Two alerts raised on 2026-10-08 (go/unsafe-quoting,go/weak-sensitive-data-hashing) have no tracking issue.Limitation: sub-agents (asset-tier-classifier, control-verifier, ai-risk-scorer) were not dispatched; the analysis was done directly from the pre-computed data, so confidence is medium.
Asset graph summary
.github/workflows/*.lock.yml: 216 npm + 10 uv + 1 pip install alerts (non-deterministic installs).pkg/workflow:maintenance_workflow_yaml_jobs.go(unsafe quoting, 2 alerts),expression_extraction.go(weak hashing),github_app_requirements.go,graders_config.go(bad-redirect-check).pkg/cli:project_command.go(GraphQL via Sprintf),add_package_manifest_*(bad redirect)..github/scripts/*.cjs: 5 insecure-temp-file alerts.Tier classification
Tier table
curl | sudo shinstallerControl verification gaps
.github/CODEOWNERS([uk-ai-resilience] Missing .github/CODEOWNERS for security-sensitive compiler/CLI paths (Tier B) #61637).Risk scoring
Scores (1-5, higher = riskier)
Remediation queue
Human review is required for the critical-rated alert and for any workflow permission or token changes.
Exception register
None.
Metrics baseline
All reactions