Repository navigation
[prompt-clustering] Prompt Clustering Analysis - 2026-10-12 #67963
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-10-13T10:18:05.814Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 30 days (2026-09-12 to 2026-10-12)
Total Tasks Analyzed: 552
Clusters Identified: 10
Overall Success Rate: 84.2% (465 merged / 552 total)
Full Analysis Report
General Insights
agenticworkflows logs) were probed for turn/cost/duration metrics; a single count-limited 5-run request took ~17s and returned only a 1-hour slice of the 30-day window, so pulling full-period turn/cost data remains infeasible in this run's time budget. Findings below rely on PR metadata, comments, and reviews only.Cluster Analysis
Cluster 4: Safe-output/security hardening
Cluster 8: Version bumps & release automation
Cluster 5: Test & CI reliability fixes
Cluster 0: MCP/tool & engine allowlists
Cluster 3: Firewall/network domain handling
Cluster 7: Model routing & engine smokes
purposevalues #67595, Add model-routing smoke workflows with deterministic runner/proxy evidence checks #67523Cluster 2: Usage accounting & eval detection
Cluster 1: Checkout/authorization fallbacks
Cluster 9: Work-queue & git policy handling
Cluster 6: CI job failure fixes (WIP)
[WIP] Fix failing GitHub Actions jobPRs with minimal diffs and little review activity, consistent with bot-triggered CI-failure auto-repair tasks.Success Rate by Cluster
Full Data Table
Representative PRs per cluster (5 each)
Key Findings
Recommendations
agenticworkflows logstool within this run's time budget; if turn-count/cost trends are wanted going forward, consider a narrower fixed window (e.g., last 3 days) sampled on a rolling basis and cached, rather than attempting a full 30-day pull each run.Generated by Prompt Clustering Analysis (Run: 38233494831)
All reactions