Repository navigation
[uk ai resilience] [uk-ai-resilience] Governance report 2026-10-15 #69061
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-10-18T15:38:25.770Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Executive summary
384 commits in 7 days (~167 human, ~158 Copilot, 48 bot), 235 with security signals. 2 open high code-scanning alerts (
js/file-system-racein.github/scripts/test_lint_monster_issues.cjs), 0 secret alerts, 22 open security-tagged issues (mostly container CVE burn-downs). Overall posture: Tier B (Open With Conditions). No hiding recommended; remediation velocity is the main lever.Limitation: sub-agents were not dispatched; synthesis done directly from pre-computed data (reduced confidence).
Asset graph summary (recent-change scoped)
Asset graph
pkg/cli,pkg/workflow): offline skill command, failure clustering, model routing, multi-repo checkout (multi: true), work-queue dispatch.Tier classification
Tier table
.github/scriptstest utilities (file-system-race)No Tier C/D areas identified.
Control verification gaps
Risk scoring
Scores (1=low risk, 5=high)
High-severity alerts are in test-only scripts so real exposure is low, but they are open and fresh.
Remediation queue
Human-review triggers: any change to safe-output patch validation or credential redaction.
Exception register
None.
Operational metrics baseline
All reactions