Repository navigation
[copilot-agent-analysis] Daily Copilot Agent Analysis - 2026-10-19 #70590
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot Agent PR Analysis. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #70926. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🤖 Copilot Agent PR Analysis - 2026-10-19
Analysis Period: window_start=2026-10-19T00:00:00Z → window_end=2026-10-20T00:00:00Z
Created (
agent_prs_total): 14 | Merged in window (agent_prs_merged): 6 | Creation-cohort success rate (agent_success_rate): 50.0% | Avg Duration: 319.5 min (~5.3h, over the 7 merged PRs)Performance Metrics
Trend: 📉 Success rate declined sharply from 76.9% (10-18) to 50.0% (10-19), -26.9pp. Caveat: 5 of the 14 PRs created on 10-19 were still open at collection time (~18-23h after window close) vs. only 1 open on 10-18, so this cohort's success rate may still rise as those resolve. History had a 52-day gap (last entry 2026-08-26); the 3-day trend above was cold-start rebuilt this run.
Agent Task Texts
model:, but not Copilot sub-agent models. An alias or a retired id (`gpt-5...file-summarizeragent file is written with the literal `model: ${{ experimen.../reflectliveness check, Pi aborts startup. However, the ses...tools.github.allowed-repospassed strict compilation but produced a ...trusted-userslisting the author and `min-integri.../reflectcatalogue made the harnes...usage/aw_session.jsonl) silently dropped data. On eve...Notable PRs
Key Insights
avg_comments(1.14) only counts human issue-comments; PR review-thread comments were inaccessible under the current integrity policy, so human engagement is likely undercounted.Generated by Copilot Agent Analysis (Run: 39474864619)
All reactions