Repository navigation
[daily-code-metrics] Daily Code Metrics Report - 2026-10-22 #71202
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Code Metrics and Trend Tracking Agent. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #71482. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
4 items found — LOC grew 0.4%; churn unavailable; quality score 71.5/100 (-0.7).
Codebase has 2,939,282 non-blank LOC across 10,648 tracked files (prior: 2,926,245 / 10,559; +0.4% LOC, +0.8% files). No scoping change detected. Test-to-source ratio is 0.46 (prior 0.457). Quality score is 71.5/100, from 72.2.
Concerns: (1)
git fetch --unshallowfailed on a TLS certificate error, so churn metrics are missing and Churn Stability uses a neutral 7.5/15. (2)clocis not installed, so a Pythongit ls-filescounter was used, same as prior days. (3) 1,232 files exceed 500 LOC. (4) Comment density is low (3.6% of lines).📊 Visualizations
Quality score by component: test coverage is maxed; code organization and comment density lose the most points.
Only 3 days of history exist; LOC rising steadily.
Go (33%) and YAML (32%, mostly lock files) dominate.
.github/workflows(1.01M) andpkg/workflow(555K) are largest.Go has the most test LOC (633K vs 345K source).
The code churn chart was not generated with data (shallow clone), so it is not embedded.
View Full Details
Method:
python git ls-files line counter (cloc unavailable; non-blank lines). Function and comment counts use a heuristic different from prior days (Gofunclines and line-comment prefixes only), so function/comment deltas are not comparable.Quality score: Test Coverage 30.0/30, Code Organization 10.5/25, Documentation 18.8/20, Churn Stability 7.5/15 (neutral), Comment Density 4.7/10 = 71.5.
Recommendations
git fetch --unshallowso churn can be tracked.clocin the runner to match the documented LOC method.pkg/workflow.All reactions