Repository navigation
[detection-analysis] Detection Analysis Report — 2026-10-23 (last 24h) #71510
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Detection Analysis Report. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #71716. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
2026-10-22T23:21Z→2026-10-23T23:21Zaw_info.json/run_summary.json, and were excluded from classification)gh-aw-detection: false): 52 (10.9%)Note
No misconfigured workflows were detected in this window. All 52
gh-aw-detection: falseruns belong to one-off smoke/conformance workflows (single run each in this window), none of which crossed the >3-run recurrence threshold that would flag an opt-out as a misconfiguration. No workflow had a failingdetectionjob, and no workflow alternated its detection setting within the window.Comparison Chart
(Success rate/avg tokens computed over completed runs only; 5 runs — including this report's own run — were still
in_progressat collection time and excluded from rate calculations.)Misconfigured Workflows
No misconfigured workflows detected in this window.
View All Run Metrics
229 distinct workflows ran in the window. Top 20 by run count:
Remaining 209 workflows (1 run each) account for 209 runs, almost entirely one-off "Smoke ..." engine-conformance checks — this is where all 52
gh-aw-detection: falseruns live (e.g. Smoke Copilot, Smoke Codex, Smoke Claude, Engine Conformance Claude/Codex/Agy). These are expected to opt out of detection by design (short-lived CI smoke tests), not misconfigurations.Top failure signals (all runs, not detection-specific): the dominant failure driver in this window was the
activationjob step "Restore daily AIC scan observations" (driver_exit, 8 runs) and downstreamconclusion-job aftermath signals (22 runs) that cascade from earlier failures rather than originating in thedetectionjob. Nodetection-job-specific failures were observed anywhere in the 475 analyzed runs.Coverage note: the initial collection hit a 3,000-item count limit and returned a continuation pointing at a narrow ~3-minute gap (
2026-10-22T23:20:58Z–23:24:16Z, before run §39871540834). A follow-up fetch for that exact gap returned 0 additional runs, so coverage for the full 24h window is effectively complete.View Historical Trend
25 historical data points now stored in cache-memory (
trending/detection-metrics/history.jsonl), covering 13 distinct days over the last 30. Detection-run volume has grown roughly 4x since 2026-10-07 while detection success rate has stayed in the 75–95% band, tracking overall run volume growth rather than detection-specific issues.Recommendations
detectionjob or inconsistent opt-out/opt-in behavior this window.gh-aw-detection: falsesetting is appropriate for short, single-run CI checks and doesn't meet the recurrence bar for flagging.activationjob failure pattern separately — "Restore daily AIC scan observations" failed in 8 runs across multiple workflows this window (e.g. run §39936302841). This is an infra/cache-restore issue upstream of both regular and detection paths, not a detection-feature defect, but it's the single largest failure cluster in the window and worth its own investigation.References:
activation-job failure clusterAll reactions