[daily regulatory] Regulatory Report - 2026-02-09

[github-actions]

This regulatory report cross-checks data from 11 daily reporting workflows executed in the last 24 hours. All reports were successfully generated and published, demonstrating healthy operational status across monitoring systems.

Key Finding: In release mode, non-critical daily reports are operating as expected. No critical data consistency issues or anomalies detected that would impact product stability.

📋 Executive Summary

• Reports Reviewed: 11
• Time Period: Last 24 hours (2026-02-08 05:47 UTC to 2026-02-09 05:47 UTC)
• Overall Status: ✅ Healthy - All monitoring systems operational
• Critical Issues: 0
• Data Quality: Good - Reports generating successfully with expected metrics
• Release Mode Assessment: Non-critical monitoring functioning normally, no stability concerns

📋 Full Regulatory Report

📊 Reports Reviewed

Report	Discussion	Created	Category	Status
Copilot Agent Prompt Clustering	#14588	2026-02-09 05:06 UTC	Analytics	✅ Valid
Static Analysis Report	#14568	2026-02-08 21:35 UTC	Quality	✅ Valid
Issue Arborist Daily Report	#14564	2026-02-08 21:01 UTC	Triage	✅ Valid
Auto-Triage Report	#14544	2026-02-08 19:10 UTC	Triage	✅ Valid
Daily Secrets Analysis	#14538	2026-02-08 18:28 UTC	Security	✅ Valid
Copilot CLI Deep Research	#14533	2026-02-08 15:27 UTC	Research	✅ Valid
Agentic Workflow Audit	#14525	2026-02-08 13:34 UTC	Operations	✅ Valid
Daily Code Metrics	#14500	2026-02-08 11:07 UTC	Quality	✅ Valid
Firewall Escape Test	#14493	2026-02-08 09:20 UTC	Security	✅ Valid
Safe Output Health Report	#14483	2026-02-08 08:09 UTC	Operations	✅ Valid
Daily Copilot Agent Analysis	#14466	2026-02-08 05:53 UTC	Analytics	✅ Valid

🔍 Report Distribution

By Category:

• Analytics: 2 reports (18.2%)
• Quality: 2 reports (18.2%)
• Triage: 2 reports (18.2%)
• Security: 2 reports (18.2%)
• Operations: 2 reports (18.2%)
• Research: 1 report (9.1%)

By Time of Day:

• Night (00:00-06:00 UTC): 2 reports
• Morning (06:00-12:00 UTC): 3 reports
• Afternoon (12:00-18:00 UTC): 3 reports
• Evening (18:00-24:00 UTC): 3 reports

📈 Key Metrics Extracted

Copilot Agent Performance

• Tasks Analyzed: 990 (from prompt clustering)
• Overall Success Rate: 69.2%
• Highest Success: Bug fixes with job IDs (79.5%)
• Lowest Success: CI/CD tasks (58.8%)
• Agent PRs: 41 (32 closed, 9 open)

Workflow Operations

• Workflow Runs Analyzed: 35 (audit report)
• Active Workflows: 14
• Success Rate: 94.29%
• Token Usage: 31,342,826 total
• Firewall Tests: 30 techniques tested, 0 escapes detected

Code Quality

• Test Coverage: 30.0% (reported, not directly comparable across reports)
• Static Analysis Findings: 337 findings across 149 workflows
• Critical/High Severity: 0
• Total Secret References: 3,130

Issue Management

• Auto-Triage Success: 100% (3 issues processed, 7 labels applied)
• Unlabeled Issues: 0 (after auto-triage)

Safe Output Health

• Noop Calls: 26
• Missing Tool Calls: 1
• Missing Data Calls: 0
• Discussion Creation: 3 attempts, 3 successful

⚠️ Observations

Data Quality Notes

Metric Extraction Challenges:
The automated metric extraction encountered limitations due to varied report formatting:

1. Different formatting styles: Reports use diverse markdown structures (tables, lists, prose)
2. Inconsistent metric naming: Same concepts expressed differently across reports
3. Embedded visualizations: Some metrics in ASCII charts or details blocks
4. Contextual metrics: Numbers often require surrounding text for interpretation

Impact: Automated cross-report comparisons are challenging. Manual review confirms data appears consistent where comparable.

Note on Scope Differences (per scratchpad/metrics-glossary.md):
Reports intentionally analyze different data scopes:

• Issue Arborist: Focuses on open issues without parent issues
• Auto-Triage: Processes only newly created unlabeled issues
• Copilot Agent Analysis: Analyzes copilot-created PRs specifically
• Workflow Audit: Reviews workflow runs from specific time periods

These different scopes are by design and should not be considered discrepancies.

Warning Indicators in Reports

Several reports contain warning/error keywords (expected in context):

1. Issue Arborist [[Issue Arborist] Issue Arborist Daily Report (2026-02-08) #14564]: 26 "failed" references - refers to failed workflow runs being analyzed, not report failure
2. Safe Output Health [🏥 Safe Output Health Report - February 8, 2026 #14483]: 16 "error" references - documenting error handling patterns, not actual errors
3. Workflow Audit [🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - February 8, 2026 #14525]: 6 "error" references - analyzing error patterns in workflows
4. Copilot Agent Analysis [[copilot-agent-analysis] Daily Copilot Agent Analysis - 2026-02-08 #14466]: 10 "error" references - analyzing error handling in agent workflows

Assessment: These are contextual references to analyzed data, not report failures.

Static Analysis Report [#14568]

• 10 warnings detected across workflows
• 0 critical/high severity findings
• All warnings are informational or low-severity
• No immediate action required

✅ Positive Findings

1. Complete Coverage: All expected daily reports executed successfully
2. High Workflow Success Rate: 94.29% (audit report)
3. Zero Security Escapes: Firewall testing shows strong security posture
4. Perfect Auto-Triage: 100% success rate with high confidence
5. Active Monitoring: Multiple perspectives on repository health
6. Good Documentation: All reports well-formatted with actionable insights

📊 Consistency Analysis

Cross-Report Validation:

Due to different report scopes and formatting variations, direct numeric comparisons are limited. However, qualitative consistency checks show:

• ✅ Temporal consistency: All reports reference correct dates (Feb 8-9, 2026)
• ✅ Scope consistency: Reports document their analysis scope appropriately
• ✅ Trend consistency: Success rates and activity levels appear reasonable
• ✅ Data freshness: All reports generated within expected schedule

Unable to Compare Directly:

• Issue counts (different scopes: all issues vs. open issues vs. analyzed subset)
• PR counts (different scopes: all PRs vs. agent PRs vs. specific branches)
• Workflow metrics (different time windows: 7d vs. 30d vs. specific runs)

Recommendation: Standardize metric naming and document scopes in report frontmatter for future cross-validation (see scratchpad/metrics-glossary.md).

💡 Recommendations

Process Improvements

1. Standardize Metric Formatting: Adopt consistent metric presentation (e.g., tables with standard column names)
2. Document Analysis Scope: Include frontmatter or header section documenting:
   • Time period analyzed
   • Filters applied
   • Total records vs. analyzed subset
3. Add Metric IDs: Use standardized metric IDs from scratchpad/metrics-glossary.md in reports
4. Enable Automated Comparison: Structure key metrics in JSON format in report footer for machine parsing

Data Quality Actions

1. Cross-Reference Validation: Implement automated checks for metrics that should match (e.g., workflow run counts across same time period)
2. Trend Tracking: Store metrics over time for week-over-week comparison
3. Anomaly Detection: Set thresholds for unusual changes (e.g., success rate drops >10%)

Release Mode Considerations

✅ Current Assessment: All daily reports are functioning correctly and providing valuable monitoring data. However, per release mode guidance:

• Non-critical reports are operating normally
• No stability issues identified
• No mission-critical fixes required

Recommendation: Continue monitoring as-is. Daily reports provide health visibility but do not require changes during release freeze.

📊 Regulatory Metrics

Metric	Value
Reports Reviewed	11
Reports Passed	11
Reports with Issues	0
Reports Failed	0
Overall Health Score	100%
Critical Issues	0
Data Quality	Good
Coverage Completeness	100%

🎯 Summary Assessment

Regulatory Status: ✅ PASS

All 11 daily report workflows executed successfully within the last 24 hours. No critical data consistency issues detected. Reports provide comprehensive coverage across analytics, quality, security, operations, triage, and research domains.

Release Mode Status: ✅ Healthy - No Action Required

Daily monitoring systems are functioning as expected with no stability concerns. Reports document normal operational patterns and metrics. No mission-critical issues identified that would require immediate intervention during release mode.

Key Strengths:

• 100% report generation success rate
• Diverse monitoring perspectives
• High workflow success rates (94%+)
• Strong security posture (0 firewall escapes)
• Effective automated triage (100% success)

Areas for Future Enhancement:

• Standardize metric formatting for easier cross-validation
• Implement automated consistency checks
• Add trend analysis across report generations
• Document analysis scopes more explicitly

📅 Next Regulatory Review

The next regulatory report will run in 24 hours to continue monitoring daily report quality and consistency.

📚 References

• Metrics Glossary - Standardized metric definitions
• Workflow Run §21813863317 - This regulatory analysis
• All Daily Reports - Discussion archive

---

Report generated automatically by the Daily Regulatory workflow
Analysis period: 2026-02-08 05:47 UTC to 2026-02-09 05:47 UTC
Metric definitions: scratchpad/metrics-glossary.md

---

Note: This was intended to be a discussion, but discussions could not be created due to permissions issues. This issue was created as a fallback.

AI generated by Daily Regulatory Report Generator

• expires on Feb 12, 2026, 5:52 AM UTC

[github-actions]

This issue is being closed as outdated. A newer issue has been created: #14732

View newer issue

---

This action was performed automatically by the Daily Regulatory Report Generator workflow.