[performance] Regression in CompileSimpleWorkflow: 45.5% slower

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Regression Detected

Benchmark: BenchmarkCompileSimpleWorkflow

Current Performance: 8,908,557 ns/op (8.91ms)
Historical Average: 6,120,003 ns/op (6.12ms)
Change: +45.5% slower
Historical Data Points: 4 runs

📈 Detailed Performance Metrics

Performance Comparison

Metric	Current	Historical Avg	Change
ns/op	8,908,557	6,120,003	+45.5%
B/op	1,888,664	—	—
allocs/op	16,150	—	—

Historical Trend (ns/op)

Date	ns/op	ms
2026-04-05	6,597,845	6.60ms
2026-04-06	6,021,823	6.02ms
2026-04-07	5,743,228	5.74ms
2026-04-10	5,077,116	5.08ms
2026-04-11	8,908,557	8.91ms ⚠️

Note: Prior trend was improving (decreasing), today's result reverses that trend.

Baseline Targets

• Simple workflows target: <100ms ✅ (within target, but regressed vs recent baseline)

💡 Recommended Actions

1. Review recent changes to the compilation pipeline (especially simple workflow handling)
2. Run make bench-memory to generate memory profiles
3. Use go tool pprof to identify hotspots in the simple workflow compilation path
4. Compare with previous benchmark results: benchstat

📋 Additional Context

• Run ID: §24275838753
• Date: 2026-04-11
• Benchmark: BenchmarkCompileSimpleWorkflow in pkg/workflow/
• Iterations: 3

References:

• §24275838753

Generated by Daily CLI Performance Agent · ● 771.4K · ◷

• expires on Apr 13, 2026, 5:43 AM UTC

[github-actions]

🍪 Issue Monster has assigned this to Copilot!

I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and assigned it to the Copilot coding agent.

The Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.

Om nom nom! 🍪

🍪 Om nom nom by Issue Monster · ● 333.3K · ◷