Skip to content

[observability escalation] Design Decision Gate πŸ—οΈ β€” repeated resource-heavy runs with increasing turn countsΒ #27293

@github-actions

Description

@github-actions

Design Decision Gate πŸ—οΈ has crossed the escalation threshold with 2 consecutive runs both carrying a high-severity resource_heavy_for_domain assessment, cohort-matched baselines confirming turns_increase, and the latest run also showing medium poor_agentic_control.

Evidence

Run Turns Classification Assessments
Β§24648171195 4 baseline β€”
Β§24649877750 8 changed / turns_increase resource_heavy_for_domain HIGH
Β§24650414222 10 changed / turns_increase resource_heavy_for_domain HIGH, poor_agentic_control MEDIUM

The turn count has grown 4 β†’ 8 β†’ 10 across 3 runs today. The latest run used 9 distinct tool types in an exploratory, broad-tool posture. Agentic fraction is ~50%, meaning roughly half the turns are pure data-gathering that could be moved to deterministic pre-steps.

Why This Matters

  • Engine: claude (frontier model cost)
  • Execution style: exploratory, tool breadth: broad β€” weakly scoped
  • The system flagged it as partially_reducible and model_downgrade_available
  • Pattern is worsening across runs, not stabilizing

Recommended Fix

  1. Tighten instructions β€” Reduce scope so the agent does not explore broadly. Narrow the task to a specific question rather than open-ended analysis.
  2. Move data-gathering to pre-steps β€” The ~50% data-gathering fraction can become deterministic frontmatter steps writing to /tmp/gh-aw/agent/, reducing inference turns.
  3. Reduce tool breadth β€” Limit available tools to what the task strictly needs. 9 tool types for an issue-response workflow is excessive.
  4. Try a smaller model β€” claude-haiku-4-5 is recommended by the assessment. The task (issue response / decision gating) is well-suited to a smaller model.

Suggested Route

workflow:Design Decision Gate πŸ—οΈ β€” workflow owners should review the prompt and tool configuration.

See the full observability report discussion for context on related workflows and the broader resource-heaviness pattern across the repository.

Generated by Agentic Observability Kit Β· ● 887.4K Β· β—·

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions