Description
The dependabot-go-checker workflow fails to compile due to the vulnerability-alerts: read permission being declared at the job level, which is not allowed in the GitHub Actions schema. The permission must be at the workflow level. This blocks the agentic-maintenance compilation workflow from passing CI.
Error from Workflow Health Dashboard (2026-04-24):
vulnerability-alerts: read permission not allowed at job level in GitHub Actions schema
Expected Impact
Unblocks the agentic-maintenance workflow compilation. One-line fix that restores CI green on this workflow.
Suggested Agent
An agent should open dependabot-go-checker.md, find the permissions: block under the job definition, and move vulnerability-alerts: read to the top-level permissions: block in the workflow frontmatter. Then recompile the lock file.
Estimated Effort
Fast (< 30 min) — single-line move in the workflow markdown.
Data Source
DeepReport Intelligence Briefing — April 24, 2026 (run §24896194233). Flagged in the Workflow Health Dashboard discussion #28258.
Generated by DeepReport - Intelligence Gathering Agent · ● 570.7K · ◷
Description
The
dependabot-go-checkerworkflow fails to compile due to thevulnerability-alerts: readpermission being declared at the job level, which is not allowed in the GitHub Actions schema. The permission must be at the workflow level. This blocks theagentic-maintenancecompilation workflow from passing CI.Error from Workflow Health Dashboard (2026-04-24):
Expected Impact
Unblocks the
agentic-maintenanceworkflow compilation. One-line fix that restores CI green on this workflow.Suggested Agent
An agent should open
dependabot-go-checker.md, find thepermissions:block under the job definition, and movevulnerability-alerts: readto the top-levelpermissions:block in the workflow frontmatter. Then recompile the lock file.Estimated Effort
Fast (< 30 min) — single-line move in the workflow markdown.
Data Source
DeepReport Intelligence Briefing — April 24, 2026 (run §24896194233). Flagged in the Workflow Health Dashboard discussion #28258.