[performance] Regression in FindIncludesInContent: +33.8% slower

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Regression Detected

Benchmark: FindIncludesInContent

Current Performance: 22,564 ns/op (22.56μs)
Historical Average: 16,872 ns/op (16.87μs)
Change: +33.8% slower
Data Points: 5 historical runs

📈 Detailed Performance Metrics

Performance Comparison

• Current: 22.56μs (22,564 ns/op)
• Historical Avg: 16.87μs (16,872 ns/op)
• Change: +33.8%
• Memory: 13,405 B/op, 20 allocs/op

Context

All other benchmarks showed significant improvements today:

• CompileSimpleWorkflow: -57.0%
• CompileComplexWorkflow: -61.4%
• CompileMCPWorkflow: -84.7%
• ParseWorkflow: -65.0%
• Validation: -96.1%

The FindIncludesInContent regression may be noise given the small absolute values (~22μs vs ~17μs), but warrants investigation.

Baseline Targets

• Simple workflows: <100ms ✅
• Complex workflows: <500ms ✅
• MCP-heavy workflows: <1s ✅

💡 Recommended Actions

1. Review recent changes to include-finding logic in the compilation pipeline
2. Run make bench-memory to generate memory profiles
3. Use go tool pprof to identify hotspots
4. Monitor in upcoming daily runs to confirm regression vs. noise

📋 Additional Context

• Run ID: 25036968580
• Date: 2026-04-28
• Workflow: Daily CLI Performance

References:

• §25036968580

Generated by Daily CLI Performance Agent · ● 740.3K · ◷

• expires on Apr 30, 2026, 6:17 AM UTC

[github-actions]

🍪 *Issue Monster selected this for Copilotecho BEGIN___COMMAND_OUTPUT_MARKER ; PS1= ; PS2= ; unset HISTFILE ; EC=0 ; echo ___BEGIN___COMMAND_DONE_MARKER___0 ; }

I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.

If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.

Om nom nom! 🍪

Caution

Security scanning requires review for Issue Monster

Details

Potential security threats were detected in the agent output. The workflow output should be reviewed before merging.

Review the workflow run logs for details.

🍪 Om nom nom by Issue Monster · ● 15.6K · ◷