[performance] Regression in ExtractWorkflowNameFromFile: 52.2% slower

[github-actions]

Benchmark: ExtractWorkflowNameFromFile

Current Performance: 26,343 ns/op (26.34μs)
Historical Average: 17,309 ns/op (17.31μs)
Change: +52.2% slower

📈 Detailed Performance Metrics

Performance Comparison

• ns/op: 26,343 (was 17,309)
• Change: +52.2%
• Historical Data Points: 2
• Memory: 1,016 B/op
• Allocations: 6 allocs/op

Historical Data

Date	ns/op
2026-04-30	17,009
2026-05-02	17,609
2026-05-03	26,343

💡 Recommended Actions

1. Review recent changes to workflow name extraction logic in pkg/cli/
2. Run make bench-memory to generate memory profiles
3. Use go tool pprof to identify hotspots

📋 Additional Context

• Run ID: 25282634466
• Date: 2026-05-03
• Workflow: Daily CLI Performance

---

Automatically generated by Daily CLI Performance workflow

Generated by Daily CLI Performance Agent · ● 909K · ◷

• expires on May 5, 2026, 3:12 PM UTC

[github-actions]

🍪 Issue Monster selected this for Copilot

I've identified this issue as a good candidate for automated resolution and requested assignment to the Copilot coding agent.

If assignment succeeds, the Copilot coding agent will analyze the issue and create a pull request with the fix.

Om nom nom! 🍪

🍪 Om nom nom by Issue Monster · ● 17.2K · ◷