[Outcome Report] Outcome Report: 2026-05-29 — 16 outcomes, 100% acceptance, 62.5% pending

[github-actions]

Outcome Scorecard — 2026-05-29

Metric	Value	Status
Acceptance rate	100%	🟢 >80%
Zero-touch rate	0%	🔴 <25%
Waste rate	0%	🟢 <10%
Median time to resolution	—	(no completed items)
Accepted	2 / 16	—
— strong evidence	1	merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence	1	engaged, retained
— weak evidence	0	existence only
Rejected	0	—
Ignored	0	no observable follow-up
Zero-touch	0 / 2	—
Pending	10	—
Unknown	2	unclear terminal state
Runs checked	9	—

🟡 Key Observations

1. Early-stage workflow — mostly pending

• 10 of 16 outcomes (62.5%) are still pending, which is expected for a collection run early in the day.
• 2 items have unknown terminal state (likely data quality issues with evaluator).
• Only 2 outcomes have reached a terminal state so far: 1 accepted (strong), 1 accepted (medium).

2. Zero-touch rate remains 0%

• Both accepted items required human interaction or follow-up, indicating bot outputs need refinement or are appropriately scoped for review.
• This mirrors the 2026-05-28 baseline (0% zero-touch).

3. Data quality flag: 2 fallback evaluations

• 2 of 16 outcomes (12.5%) were evaluated with only generic existence checks (fallback_exists_only_count).
• Below the 20% threshold, but still present. These items contribute weak signal.

Per-Workflow Status

Workflow	Items	Accepted	Pending	Unknown	Acceptance
Chaos PR Bundle Fuzzer	5	0	5	0	—
PR Sous Chef	2	1	1	0	50%
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	2	0	1	1	—
Issue Monster	2	0	2	0	—
PR Description Updater	1	1	0	0	100%
PR Code Quality Reviewer	1	0	0	1	—
Daily Sentrux Report	1	0	0	1	—
Release	1	0	0	1	—
Daily Model Inventory Checker	1	0	1	0	—

🔵 Trend Analysis — vs. 2026-05-28

Metric	Yesterday	Today	Change
Acceptance rate	100%	100%	➡️ Stable
Zero-touch rate	0%	0%	➡️ Stable
Pending %	38.5%	62.5%	⬆️ More pending
Runs checked	7	9	⬆️ +2 runs

Interpretation: The increase in pending items is expected and natural—this collection captured more workflow runs today (9 vs 7 yesterday). The acceptance rate and zero-touch rate remain stable, which is a good signal of consistent bot behavior.

⚠️ Action Items

1. Monitor unknown evaluations — 2 outcomes were marked "unknown" (PR Code Quality Reviewer, Daily Sentrux Report, Release). Check if these workflows are producing outputs that the evaluators cannot classify. May indicate missing outcome types or data schema mismatches.

2. Low workflow engagement on Chaos PR Bundle Fuzzer — 5 items pending with no accepted outcomes yet. If these are multi-day workflows, normal; if single-day, may indicate prompts need refinement.

3. Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer: 1 unknown, 1 pending — Only 2 items tracked. If this is a new workflow, expected; if established, monitor for data collection issues.

4. Next report target — Aim for 15+ outcomes and <5% data quality fallback rate. Continue capturing runs; wait for items to reach terminal states before analyzing trends.

Evidence Quality

⚠️ 2 item(s) were evaluated using only a generic existence check (signal: fallback_exists_only_count = 2). These contribute to weak evidence and may slightly overstate acceptance. Dedicated evaluators provide stronger signals.

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 28.9K

• expires on Jun 5, 2026, 1:38 AM UTC

[github-actions]

Outcome Scorecard — 2026-05-29

Metric	Value	Status
Acceptance rate	100%	🟢 >80%
Zero-touch rate	0%	🔴 <25%
Waste rate	0%	🟢 <10%
Median time to resolution	46m	—
Accepted	4 / 27	—
— strong evidence	2	merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence	2	engaged, retained
— weak evidence	0	existence only
Rejected	0	—
Ignored	0	—
Unknown state	6	unknown lifecycle
Pending	17	awaiting follow-up
Zero-touch	0 / 4	—
Runs checked	12	—

🔴 Action Items

1. High pending rate (63% of outcomes) — 17 items are pending, most created in the last 15 minutes. This is typical for fresh workflow runs; monitoring needed to ensure these reach terminal states within 48 hours.

2. Zero-touch rate is 0% — All 4 accepted items required post-generation edits or follow-up. This suggests:

   • PR Description Updater: update was merged (strong acceptance)
   • Other accepted items: outcome retained through engagement
   • Workflows should review output quality to improve zero-touch acceptance

3. 6 items with unknown state — These are outcomes where the lifecycle cannot be determined:

   • PR Code Quality Reviewer (1 unknown)
   • LintMonster (1 unknown)
   • Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer (2 unknown)
   • Consider improving observability for submit_pull_request_review and create_check_run evaluation signals

4. Data quality note — 2 items (7.4% of total) evaluated via existence-only fallback. Strong evidence types are preferred.

Trend Analysis

Comparing to 2026-05-28 (previous report):

• Acceptance rate: 100% → 100% | ➡️ Stable
• Total outcomes: 13 → 27 | ⬆️ Workflow volume doubled
• Pending rate: 38% → 63% | ⬇️ More pending items (expected from fresh runs)
• Zero-touch rate: 0% → 0% | ➡️ Stable (no improvement in autonomy)

Per-Workflow Breakdown

Workflow	Items	Accepted	Pending	Unknown	Acceptance
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	7	0	5	2	0%
PR Code Quality Reviewer	5	0	4	1	0%
LintMonster	4	0	3	1	0%
Contribution Check	3	1	2	0	33%
Design Decision Gate 🏗️	2	1	1	0	50%
Test Quality Sentinel	2	1	1	0	50%
Daily Community Attribution Updater	1	1	0	0	100%
Daily Compiler Quality Check	1	0	1	0	0%
Outcome Collector	1	0	1	0	0%
PR Description Updater	1	1	0	0	100%

Summary

Today's outcomes reflect fresh workflow activity with outcomes distributed across 10 workflows. Early-stage items (pending: 17) are expected; the key metric is resolution within 48 hours. All accepted items show 100% success rate, but zero-touch acceptance indicates output quality needs focus. Unknown states for review submissions warrant improved observability.

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 31.2K

• expires on Jun 5, 2026, 4:51 AM UTC

[github-actions]

Outcome Scorecard — 2026-05-29

Metric	Value	Status
Acceptance rate	100%	🟢 >80%
Zero-touch rate	0%	🔴 <25%
Waste rate	0%	🟢 <10%
Median time to resolution	~5.7 minutes	—
Accepted	3 / 29	—
— strong evidence	2	merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence	1	engaged, retained
— weak evidence	0	existence only
Rejected	0	—
Ignored	0	—
Zero-touch	0 / 3	—
Pending	22	—
Runs checked	15	—

🔴 Action Items

1. Stuck pending items — URGENT — 22 of 29 outcomes are pending (76% of total). Most have been waiting 2+ hours:

   • 5 PRs created by "Chaos PR Bundle Fuzzer" awaiting review (~2h pending)
   • 8 issues created by various workflows ("Daily Safe Outputs Conformance Checker", "Daily AgentRx Trace Optimizer", "CLI Version Checker", "Static Analysis Report", etc.) awaiting engagement (~2h pending)
   • 4 issues in "Workflow Health Manager" and related workflows (~2h pending)
   • Recommendation: Review the 22 pending items; if they're no longer actionable, close them. If they need external action, ensure relevant teams are notified.

2. Zero-touch acceptance — Quality concern — 100% of accepted items (3/3) required zero actor follow-up after creation. This is unusual and suggests:

   • Items created and immediately merged ("comment_memory" in PR docs: Measuring Impact #35651)
   • Items that required updates to persist ("update_pull_request" in PR docs: Measuring Impact #35651)
   • Only 1 of 3 accepted items shows engagement (add_comment was acted upon)
   • Recommendation: Review the workflows generating zero-touch accepts to ensure the agent output quality matches human review standards.

3. Data quality: fallback evaluation — 1 item (3% of total outcomes) was evaluated using only a generic existence check (target_exists_only for a discussion). This is minimal, but note that submit_pull_request_review outcomes lack dedicated evaluators and were marked as unknown, suggesting the evaluation signal is weak for review submissions.

Detailed Pending Items Breakdown

High-priority pending (open, zero engagement, 2+ hours old):

• Daily Safe Outputs Conformance Checker: Issue [Safe Outputs Conformance] SEC-004: safe_output_execution_metadata.cjs flagged for body field without sanitization #35659 (1h 12m pending, no engagement)
• Daily AgentRx Trace Optimizer: Issue [agentrx-optimizer] Daily Workflow Optimization - 2026-05-29 #35658 (1h 12m pending, no engagement)
• CLI Version Checker: Issue [ca] chore: update CLI versions (Claude Code, Copilot CLI, Codex, GitHub MCP Server) #35657 (1h 23m pending, no engagement)
• Daily CLI Tools Exploratory Tester: Issue [cli-tools-test] UX: Parameter naming inconsistency between logs (--workflow_name) and compile (--workflows) #35655 (1h 29m pending, no engagement)
• Contribution Check: Issue missing URL, can't evaluate (1h 54m pending, no engagement)
• Static Analysis Report: Issue [static-analysis] RGS-018: Suspicious Payload Execution Pattern in daily-byok-ollama-test.lock.yml #35653, [static-analysis] Report - 2026-05-29 #35654 (1h 59m pending, no engagement)
• Workflow Health Manager: Issues [aw] CJS: JS Tests shard 4 failing on every push — push_to_pull_request_branch.test.cjs regression #35643, [aw] Step Name Alignment: 80% failure rate — persistent timeout/failure since May 20 #35644 (2h 11m pending, no engagement)
• Chaos PR Bundle Fuzzer: PRs [chaos-test] chaos-fossil: minor-rename+line-ending-variant [run 81] #35645, [chaos-test] patch-echo: staged-subset+two-commits [run 81] #35646, [chaos-test] drift-echo: line-ending-variant+staged-subset [run 81] #35647, [chaos-test] scope-echo: two-commits+minor-rename [run 81] #35648, [chaos-test] entropy-echo: amend+line-ending-variant [run 81] #35649 (2h 8–2h 9m pending, zero reviews)
• OTLP Data Quality Validator: Issue [OTLP Validation] OTLP validation run 26620247189 — WARN: setup span PASS, backend visibility unconfirmed #35641 (2h 23m pending, no engagement)
• PR Code Quality Reviewer: Review comment missing URL, review unknown lifecycle (2h 20m pending)
• Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer: 3 items missing URLs (2h 21m pending), 1 review with unknown lifecycle
• Test Quality Sentinel: Comment missing follow-up, review pending (2h 21m pending)

Recommendation: Batch-review these pending items and either close unactionable ones or escalate to stakeholders.

Per-Workflow Breakdown

All 15 workflows with outcomes are captured in the following summary by outcome type:

Workflow	Items	Accepted	Pending	Unknown	Notes
Smoke CI	2	2	0	0	2h strong evidence (merged comment_memory, acted-on add_comment)
PR Description Updater	1	1	0	0	update_pull_request merged
Static Analysis Report	3	0	2	1	2 issues pending, 1 closed with activity but marked unknown
Chaos PR Bundle Fuzzer	5	0	5	0	5 PRs open with zero reviews, awaiting feedback
Daily Safe Outputs Conformance Checker	1	0	1	0	Issue pending, open with no engagement
Daily AgentRx Trace Optimizer	1	0	1	0	Issue pending, open with no engagement
CLI Version Checker	1	0	1	0	Issue pending, open with no engagement
Daily CLI Tools Exploratory Tester	1	0	1	0	Issue pending, open with no engagement
Contribution Check	1	0	1	0	Issue pending, URL missing
PR Code Quality Reviewer	2	0	1	1	1 pending (no URL), 1 unknown review lifecycle
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	4	0	3	1	3 pending (2 no URLs, 1 check_run no URL), 1 unknown review
Workflow Health Manager — Meta-Orchestrator	3	0	3	0	2 issues pending, 1 comment pending (no follow-up)
OTLP Data Quality Validator	1	0	1	0	Issue pending, open with no engagement
Test Quality Sentinel	2	0	2	0	1 comment pending, 1 review pending
Schema Consistency Checker	1	0	0	1	1 discussion with weak signal (existence-only)

Key observations:

• Smoke CI is the only workflow with 100% acceptance (2/2), both with strong evidence
• Chaos PR Bundle Fuzzer is the highest-volume pending workflow (5 PRs, 2h+ old, zero reviews)
• Workflows generating 100% pending outcomes: 10 out of 15 workflows
• Unknown outcomes: Schema Consistency Checker (weak), PR Code Quality Reviewer (review lifecycle), Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer (review lifecycle), Static Analysis Report (closed issue, activity signal weak)

Accepted Items Detail

1. PR Description Updater — update_pull_request (Strong Evidence)

• Type: update_pull_request
• URL: docs: Measuring Impact #35651
• Signal: state_retained_and_merged
• Result: Accepted, merged without actor edits required

2. Smoke CI — comment_memory (Strong Evidence)

• Type: comment_memory
• URL: docs: Measuring Impact #35651 (comment)
• Signal: merged
• Result: Accepted, merged in 11 minutes (strong turnaround)
• Changes: 2 files, 112 additions, 0 deletions

3. Smoke CI — add_comment (Medium Evidence)

• Type: add_comment
• URL: docs: Measuring Impact #35651 (comment)
• Signal: acted_on
• Result: Accepted, comment generated engagement
• Notes: Comment appears to have driven subsequent review and merge

Summary

Strengths:

• Zero rejections: no waste identified
• Perfect acceptance rate for accepted items (100%)
• Smoke CI workflow demonstrates strong execution with rapid turnaround and merge

Critical Issues:

• 76% of outcomes (22/29) are pending, many approaching 2+ hour threshold
• 0% zero-touch acceptance rate suggests either strong automation (merged immediately) or weak output quality (requires edits)
• Missing URLs for multiple outcomes block evaluation (Contribution Check, PR Code Quality Reviewer, Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer)
• Unknown review lifecycle for submit_pull_request_review outcomes needs dedicated evaluator

Next Steps:

1. Triage the 22 pending items within the next 2 hours
2. Review workflows with missing output URLs (Contribution Check, PR Code Quality Reviewer, Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer)
3. Implement dedicated evaluators for submit_pull_request_review outcomes
4. Investigate zero-touch accept pattern — confirm whether it indicates automation success or output quality issues

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 27.2K

• expires on Jun 5, 2026, 8:16 AM UTC

[github-actions]

Workflow Health — 2026-05-29

Executive read: 2 workflows have multiple pending items; no stuck patterns detected yet. Fleet is in active evaluation phase with healthy resolution of early accepted outcomes.

Workflow	Status	Lifecycle health
PR Sous Chef	🟩 🟩 🟩 🟩 🟨 🟨 🟨	🟡 in flight
Contribution Check	🟨 🟨 🟨	🟡 in flight
[aw] Failure Investigator (6h)	🟩 🟩 🟨	🟢 resolving
Dependabot Dependency Checker	🟩 🟨	🟢 resolving
Package Specification Extractor	🟨	🟡 in flight
Daily OTel Instrumentation Advisor	🟨	🟡 in flight
Instructions Janitor	🟨	🟡 in flight
Go Fan	🟨	🟡 in flight
Daily Workflow Updater	🟨	🟡 in flight
Outcome Collector	🟨	🟡 in flight
Terminal Stylist	⬜	⚪ underdefined
Copilot Session Insights	⬜	⚪ underdefined

Legend:

• Status: 🟩 accepted · 🟥 rejected · 🟨 pending · ⬜ unknown
• Lifecycle health: 🟢 resolving · 🟡 in flight · 🟠 aging · 🔴 stuck · ⚪ underdefined

Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and actions

Outcome Scorecard — 2026-05-29

Metric	Value	Status
Acceptance rate	100%	🟢 >80%
Zero-touch rate	0%	🔴 <25%
Waste rate	0%	🟢 <10%
Median time to resolution	47h 53m	—
Accepted	7 / 23	—
— strong evidence	0	merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence	7	engaged, retained
— weak evidence	0	existence only
Rejected	0	—
Ignored	0	no observable follow-up
Unknown	2	—
Zero-touch	0 / 7	—
Pending	14	—
Runs checked	12	—

🔴 Action Items

1. Zero-touch acceptance — All 7 accepted items required human follow-up (0% zero-touch rate). PR Sous Chef and Failure Investigator are generating useful outputs (4 and 2 accepted respectively), but none are fully autonomous. Review output to identify if minor refinements could reduce required human edits.

2. Stuck pending items — 14 items remain pending, averaging 1–2.6 hours old. Contribution Check (3 pending), PR Sous Chef (3 pending), and several single-item workflows all have unresolved items. These are not critically aged yet, but monitor for items approaching >24 hours.

3. Underdefined workflows — Terminal Stylist and Copilot Session Insights each produced 1 unknown item (weak signal: target_exists_only). These workflows lack clear acceptance criteria or need dedicated evaluators. Note: Terminal Stylist created a discussion (35674) but the evaluator could not assess the outcome.

4. Data quality: fallback evaluations — 2 items (8.7% of total) were evaluated using only existence checks (target_exists_only). This is manageable but signals that some output types (create_discussion) lack strong engagement signals. Consider enriching evaluation signals for these types.

5. Medium-evidence acceptance — All 7 accepted items have medium evidence (engaged/retained), not strong (merged/completed). This reflects a real pattern: workflows are mostly adding comments and updating issues, not closing items or merging PRs. This is healthy output distribution for the fleet.

Per-Workflow Breakdown

Workflow	Accepted	Rejected	Ignored	Pending	Unknown	Acceptance
PR Sous Chef	4	0	0	3	0	100%
[aw] Failure Investigator (6h)	2	0	0	1	0	100%
Dependabot Dependency Checker	1	0	0	1	0	100%
Contribution Check	0	0	0	3	0	—
Package Specification Extractor	0	0	0	1	0	—
Daily OTel Instrumentation Advisor	0	0	0	1	0	—
Instructions Janitor	0	0	0	1	0	—
Go Fan	0	0	0	1	0	—
Daily Workflow Updater	0	0	0	1	0	—
Outcome Collector	0	0	0	1	0	—
Terminal Stylist	0	0	0	0	1	—
Copilot Session Insights	0	0	0	0	1	—

Evidence Quality

⚠️ 2 items were evaluated using only a generic existence check (signal: target_exists_only). These are:

• Terminal Stylist: created discussion [terminal-stylist] Terminal Stylist Report: Console Output Analysis (2026-05-29) #35674
• Copilot Session Insights: created discussion [copilot-session-insights] Daily Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-05-29 #35663

These contributions to unknown outcomes may overstate the true acceptance rate. Dedicated evaluators for create_discussion and other types provide stronger evidence (reactions, comments, follow-up engagement).

Trend Signal

Comparison with 2026-05-28 final metrics:

• Acceptance rate: stable at 100%
• Pending items: decreased from 17 → 14 (⬇️ resolving)
• Zero-touch rate: stable at 0%
• Unknown items: increased from 0 → 2 (⬆️ new signal category)

The decrease in pending items is encouraging. Unknown items are new and reflect the addition of target_exists_only evaluation signals for create_discussion outcomes.

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 49.3K

• expires on Jun 5, 2026, 10:59 AM UTC

[github-actions]

Workflow Health — 2026-05-29

Executive read: 61 outcomes evaluated; 7 accepted, 40 pending, 13 unknown. ⚠️ High pending volume — focus on PR and issue triage workflows.

Workflow	Status	Lifecycle health
Smoke Copilot	🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜	🟡 in flight
Smoke Claude	🟩🟩🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜	🟡 in flight
Chaos PR Bundle Fuzzer	🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨	🟡 in flight
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	🟨🟨🟨🟨⬜	🟡 in flight
Auto-Triage Issues	🟨🟨🟨⬜	🟡 in flight
PR Code Quality Reviewer	🟨🟨🟨⬜	🟡 in flight
Smoke Codex	🟨🟨	🟡 in flight
Agent Performance Analyzer - Meta-Orchestrator	⬜	🟢 resolving
Claude Code User Documentation Review	⬜	🟢 resolving
PR Triage Agent	🟨	🟡 in flight
Smoke Gemini	🟩🟨	🟡 in flight
Test Quality Sentinel	🟩⬜	🟢 resolving
Design Decision Gate 🏗️	🟩🟨	🟡 in flight
GitHub MCP Structural Analysis	⬜	🟢 resolving
Daily Token Consumption Report (Sentry OTel)	🟨	🟡 in flight
Daily Go Function Namer	🟨	🟡 in flight
Daily Agentic Workflow Token Usage Audit	🟨	🟡 in flight
Constraint Solving — Problem of the Day	⬜	🟢 resolving
Typist - Go Type Analysis	⬜	🟢 resolving
Agent Container Smoke Test	🟩	🟢 resolving

Legend:

• Status: 🟩 accepted · 🟥 rejected · 🟨 pending · ⬜ unknown
• Lifecycle health: 🟢 resolving · 🟡 in flight · 🟠 aging · �� stuck · ⚪ underdefined

Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and actions

Outcome Scorecard — 2026-05-29

Metric	Value	Status
Acceptance rate	87.5%	🟢 >80%
Zero-touch rate	0.0%	🔴 <25%
Waste rate	1.6%	🟢 <10%
Median time to resolution	—	—
Accepted	7 / 61	—
— strong evidence	0	merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence	7	engaged, retained
— weak evidence	0	existence only
Rejected	1	—
Ignored	0	no observable follow-up
Zero-touch	0 / 7	—
Pending	40	—
Runs checked	21	—

🔴 Action Items

1. Highest-waste workflows: Smoke Claude (8.3% waste). Review prompt or safe-output configuration.
2. Pending items awaiting resolution: 40 items across 13 workflows. Smoke Copilot has 10 pending.
3. Underdefined workflows: 5 workflow(s) with >50% unknown outcomes. These need clearer acceptance criteria.
4. Low zero-touch rate (0.0%): Most accepted items require human edits. Consider improving output quality.

Per-Workflow Breakdown

Workflow	Accepted	Rejected	Ignored	Pending	Unknown	Acceptance	Waste
Smoke Claude	2	1	0	7	2	67%	8.3%
Smoke Copilot	1	0	0	10	2	100%	—
Chaos PR Bundle Fuzzer	0	0	0	5	0	—	—
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	0	0	0	4	1	—	—
Auto-Triage Issues	0	0	0	3	1	—	—
PR Code Quality Reviewer	0	0	0	3	1	—	—
Smoke Codex	0	0	0	2	0	—	—
Agent Performance Analyzer - Meta-Orchestrator	0	0	0	0	1	—	—
Claude Code User Documentation Review	0	0	0	0	1	—	—
PR Triage Agent	0	0	0	1	0	—	—
Smoke Gemini	1	0	0	1	0	100%	—
Test Quality Sentinel	1	0	0	0	1	100%	—
Design Decision Gate 🏗️	1	0	0	1	0	100%	—
GitHub MCP Structural Analysis	0	0	0	0	1	—	—
Daily Token Consumption Report (Sentry OTel)	0	0	0	1	0	—	—
Daily Go Function Namer	0	0	0	1	0	—	—
Daily Agentic Workflow Token Usage Audit	0	0	0	1	0	—	—
Constraint Solving — Problem of the Day	0	0	0	0	1	—	—
Typist - Go Type Analysis	0	0	0	0	1	—	—
Agent Container Smoke Test	1	0	0	0	0	100%	—

Evidence Quality

⚠️ 7 item(s) (11.5%) were evaluated using only a generic existence check. These contribute to weak evidence and may overstate acceptance.

Trend Signal

⬇️ Acceptance regressing: 87.5% (was 100.0%)
➡️ Waste stable: 1.6%

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 63.8K

• expires on Jun 5, 2026, 2:02 PM UTC

[github-actions]

Workflow Health — 2026-05-29

Executive read: 7 outcomes are in early evaluation across 2 workflows. Issue Monster has 6 pending items (~3 min old); AI Moderator has 1 item pending 1h+ with stale signal. All outcomes are awaiting terminal state resolution — acceptance criteria not yet evident.

Workflow	Status	Lifecycle health
Issue Monster	🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨	🟡 in flight
AI Moderator	🟨	🟠 aging

Legend:

• Status: 🟩 accepted · 🟥 rejected · 🟨 pending · ⬜ unknown
• Lifecycle health: 🟢 resolving · 🟡 in flight · 🟠 aging · 🔴 stuck · ⚪ underdefined

Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and actions

Outcome Scorecard — 2026-05-29

Metric	Value	Status
Acceptance rate	0%	🔴 <60% (no terminal outcomes)
Zero-touch rate	0%	🔴 <25% (no accepted items)
Waste rate	0%	🟢 <10%
Median time to resolution	—	—
Accepted	0 / 7	—
— strong evidence	0	merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence	0	engaged, retained
— weak evidence	0	existence only
Rejected	0	—
Ignored	0	no observable follow-up
Zero-touch	0 / 0	—
Pending	7	—
Runs checked	2	—

🔴 Action Items

1. Early evaluation cycle — All 7 outcomes are pending with no terminal states. Continue monitoring for resolution signals (merged PRs, issue closures, comments, etc.) over the next 1–2 hours.

2. Aging AI Moderator item — 1 item has been pending 1h+ (3661 sec) with stale signal ("no url"). This suggests either the workflow needs a timeout or the evaluation criteria need refinement. Verify that the outcome is still valid or mark as rejected.

3. Issue Monster batch evaluation — 6 items are recent (avg ~3 min pending). Expect most to resolve within the next monitoring window if the outputs are well-formed and engaged with.

4. Zero terminal outcomes — No acceptance/rejection/ignore signals exist yet. Once terminal states emerge, this report will provide clarity on workflow health and output quality.

Per-Workflow Breakdown

Workflow	Accepted	Rejected	Ignored	Pending	Acceptance	Zero-touch
Issue Monster	0	0	0	6	—	—
AI Moderator	0	0	0	1	—	—

Evidence Quality

All 7 items are in pending state awaiting resolution. Evidence strength is marked as medium (evaluation in progress, awaiting observable follow-up signals such as comments, reactions, or state changes).

Trend Signal

Compared to 2026-05-28 final metrics:

• 2026-05-28: 13 total outcomes, 8 accepted, 5 pending (1.0 acceptance rate)
• 2026-05-29 current: 7 total outcomes, 0 accepted, 7 pending (0.0 acceptance rate)

⬇️ Regressing — New evaluation cycle contains only pending items with no terminal outcomes yet. This is expected early-cycle behavior; comparison will be meaningful once this batch reaches terminal states.

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 32.7K

• expires on Jun 5, 2026, 3:53 PM UTC

[github-actions]

Workflow Health — 2026-05-29

Executive read: Most outcomes are pending (12/18, 67%), concentrated in Issue Monster (6 items) and review-workflow comments. Review submissions are unresolved (unknown status). Zero-touch rate is 0%, suggesting accepted items need follow-up work.

Workflow	Status	Lifecycle health	References
Issue Monster	🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨	🟡 in flight	P: #35737 #35738 #35769
PR Code Quality Reviewer	🟨🟨⬜	🟡 in flight	P: #35767
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	🟨🟨🟨⬜	🟡 in flight	P: #35767
Design Decision Gate 🏗️	🟨	🟡 in flight	P: #35767
Test Quality Sentinel	🟩⬜	🟢 resolving	A: #35767
PR Description Updater	🟩	🟢 resolving	A: #35767
Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer	⬜	⚪ underdefined	U: #35771

Legend:

• Status: 🟩 accepted · 🟥 rejected · 🟨 pending · ⬜ unknown
• Lifecycle health: 🟢 resolving · 🟡 in flight · 🟠 aging · 🔴 stuck · ⚪ underdefined
• References: accepted/rejected/pending/ignored/unknown links for quick verification

🔴 Action Items

1. Pending items aging without resolution — Issue Monster has 6 pending items (45-46 minutes old). Design Decision Gate, PR Code Quality Reviewer, and Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer all have pending items >54 minutes old. These need manual review to determine if they should be resolved or the workflow needs timeout logic.

2. Unknown review submissions — Three workflows (Test Quality Sentinel, PR Code Quality Reviewer, Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer) submitted PR reviews with unknown lifecycle status. The evaluator cannot determine if these reviews were accepted, dismissed, or are pending action. Need dedicated review lifecycle tracking.

3. Zero-touch rate is 0% — All 2 accepted items required follow-up work (1 retained-then-merged, 1 engaged). This indicates the agents need improvement in producing acceptance-ready outputs, or the workflows have narrow success criteria.

4. Missing URLs on pending items — Issue Monster's 3 assign_to_agent items and PR Code Quality Reviewer's create_pull_request_review_comment items have no URLs ("detail": "no url"). These cannot be verified; safe-output may be dropping URL generation or these operations are failing silently.

5. Weak signal on unknown items — The Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer's discussion was evaluated using only existence check ("signal": "target_exists_only"). This is valid for some workflows, but if engagement/acceptance criteria are unclear, the workflow is underdefined.

Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and trends

Outcome Scorecard — 2026-05-29

Metric	Value	Status
Acceptance rate	100.0%	🟢 >80%
Zero-touch rate	0.0%	🔴 <25%
Waste rate	0.0%	🟢 <10%
Median time to resolution	—	—
Accepted	2 / 18	—
— strong evidence	1	merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence	1	engaged, retained
— weak evidence	0	existence only
Rejected	0	—
Ignored	0	no observable follow-up
Zero-touch	0 / 2	—
Pending	12	—
Unknown	4	—
Runs checked	7	—

Per-Workflow Breakdown

Workflow	Accepted	Rejected	Ignored	Pending	Unknown	Acceptance	Zero-touch
Issue Monster	0	0	0	6	0	—	—
PR Code Quality Reviewer	0	0	0	2	1	—	—
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer	0	0	0	3	1	—	—
Design Decision Gate 🏗️	0	0	0	1	0	—	—
Test Quality Sentinel	1	0	0	0	1	100%	0%
PR Description Updater	1	0	0	0	0	100%	0%
Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer	0	0	0	0	1	—	—

Evidence Quality

⚠️ 1 item was evaluated using only a generic existence check (signal: target_exists_only). This contributes to unknown classification and indicates weak signal. Dedicated evaluators for add_reviewer, submit_pull_request_review, update_issue, update_pull_request, and other types provide stronger evidence.

Additionally, 3 items (submit_pull_request_review submissions) have unknown lifecycle status. These cannot be definitively classified as accepted/rejected without PR review lifecycle tracking.

Trend Signal

Comparison to previous report (2026-05-29-final):

• Previous: acceptance_rate 87.5%, zero_touch_rate 0.0%, total_outcomes 61
• Current: acceptance_rate 100.0%, zero_touch_rate 0.0%, total_outcomes 18
• Acceptance rate improved (+12.5pp) but on a smaller outcome set. Zero-touch rate remains 0%, suggesting output quality issues persist.

The previous report showed 40 pending items across all workflows; this report shows 12 in only 7 runs checked. This may indicate either:

1. Workflows are more conservative (fewer outcomes being tracked)
2. Fewer workflows active in this cycle
3. Evaluation window is more recent

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 48K

• expires on Jun 5, 2026, 8:20 PM UTC

[github-actions]

This issue is being closed as outdated. A newer issue has been created: #35858

View newer issue

---

This action was performed automatically by the Outcome Collector workflow.