Skip to content

Switch ci-doctor workflow engine from codex to claude#24948

Merged
pelikhan merged 1 commit intocopilot/fix-unknown-tool-names-warningfrom
copilot/use-claude-for-agentic-workflow
Apr 6, 2026
Merged

Switch ci-doctor workflow engine from codex to claude#24948
pelikhan merged 1 commit intocopilot/fix-unknown-tool-names-warningfrom
copilot/use-claude-for-agentic-workflow

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Apr 6, 2026

The CI Failure Doctor workflow was running on the Codex engine, which was failing. Switches it to Claude Code.

Changes

  • engine: codexengine: claude in ci-doctor.md
  • Recompiled ci-doctor.lock.yml to use Claude Code CLI invocation

@pelikhan pelikhan marked this pull request as ready for review April 6, 2026 20:34
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 6, 2026 20:34
@pelikhan pelikhan merged commit f3da2d7 into copilot/fix-unknown-tool-names-warning Apr 6, 2026
50 of 51 checks passed
@pelikhan pelikhan deleted the copilot/use-claude-for-agentic-workflow branch April 6, 2026 20:34
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Switches the CI Failure Doctor Agentic Workflow from the Codex engine to Claude Code to address failures with the prior engine configuration.

Changes:

  • Update workflow frontmatter to engine: claude in ci-doctor.md.
  • Regenerate the compiled lock workflow to use Claude Code CLI invocation, Anthropic secret validation, and Claude-specific parsing.
Show a summary per file
File Description
.github/workflows/ci-doctor.md Switches the workflow engine selection from Codex to Claude in the source workflow definition.
.github/workflows/ci-doctor.lock.yml Recompiled generated workflow to run via Claude Code CLI and use ANTHROPIC_API_KEY + Claude log parsing.

Copilot's findings

Tip

Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

  • Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants