Skip to content

[schema-coverage] feat: add schema coverage demo for run-name field#36205

Merged
pelikhan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
schema-coverage-run-name-2772d42d1a965193
Jun 1, 2026
Merged

[schema-coverage] feat: add schema coverage demo for run-name field#36205
pelikhan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
schema-coverage-run-name-2772d42d1a965193

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Summary

Adds a new schema-demo workflow file that exercises the run-name frontmatter field, completing 100% schema feature coverage for the gh-aw frontmatter spec.

Changes

schema-demos/schema-demo-run-name.md (added)

  • New demo workflow targeting the run-name frontmatter field — the last uncovered schema feature.
  • Sets run-name: Schema Demo Run alongside the standard required fields (on, permissions, engine, timeout-minutes).
  • Uses the noop safe-output tool so the workflow is runnable without side effects.
  • Includes inline documentation explaining what run-name does (custom label shown in the GitHub Actions UI).

Impact Assessment

Dimension Assessment
Breaking change No
Risk Low — demo/documentation file only; no production logic affected
Test impact None — no unit or integration tests required for a coverage-demo workflow
Schema coverage Achieves 100% frontmatter schema field coverage

Commit

SHA Message
b605aa264 feat: add schema coverage demo for run-name

Generated by PR Description Updater for issue #36205 · sonnet46 666.4K ·

@pelikhan pelikhan marked this pull request as ready for review June 1, 2026 11:20
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 1, 2026 11:20
@pelikhan pelikhan merged commit 5748896 into main Jun 1, 2026
4 checks passed
@pelikhan pelikhan deleted the schema-coverage-run-name-2772d42d1a965193 branch June 1, 2026 11:20
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

🧪 Test Quality Sentinel completed test quality analysis.

No test files were added or modified in this PR. The only changed file is schema-demos/schema-demo-run-name.md (a markdown schema demo file). Test Quality Sentinel skipped.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

PR Code Quality Reviewer completed the code quality review.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Design Decision Gate 🏗️ completed the design decision gate check.

No ADR enforcement needed: PR #36205 does not have the 'implementation' label and has 0 new lines of code in business logic directories (≤100 threshold). The changed files are skill scripts (.github/skills/) and an MCP server config (.github/workflows/shared/mcp/), none of which fall under tracked business logic directories.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

🧠 Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer has completed the skills-based review. ✅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No blocking issues. Single new schema-demo markdown file — no logic, no Go code, no security surface. run-name field usage is valid and follows the existing demo pattern.

🔎 Code quality review by PR Code Quality Reviewer · sonnet46 487.6K

@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Skills-Based Review 🧠

Applied /grill-with-docs — clean, conforming addition. ✅ Approved.

📋 Key Themes & Highlights

Positive Highlights

  • ✅ Follows the established schema-demos/ pattern exactly (frontmatter, structure, noop task)
  • run-name field is correctly placed with a valid static string value
  • ✅ Description, heading, and body text are consistent with other demos in the directory
  • ✅ No new abstractions or vocabulary introduced — pure conformance

No Issues Found

No blocking or advisory issues. The file is consistent with every other demo in the directory.

🧠 Reviewed using Matt Pocock's skills by Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer · sonnet46 780.4K

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants