Replies: 1 comment
|
@trent-j hey, as far as I know you are the person who can answer that or at least give a hint :) |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi team,
Following the guidance in #1257 (onboarding to github.com/mcp is still a manual curation step, with version sync from the OSS registry afterwards), I'd like to request onboarding for a server that's already published and validated on the open source registry.
Server details
io.github.TsvetanG2/cognigy-ai-mcp-management-serverWhat it does
It exposes the Cognigy.AI management REST API (agents, flows, endpoints, lexicons, NLU, snapshots, deployments, playbooks) as 132 granular MCP tools, so an agent can build and operate a Cognigy project end to end without leaving the client.
Why it may be worth a slot
NiCE ships an official Cognigy MCP server with a consolidated ~16-tool surface. This one takes the opposite approach deliberately: one tool per API operation, so tool selection carries the semantics instead of a dispatch parameter. The two are complementary rather than duplicates, and the granular surface is the one that works better for multi-step authoring workflows. Happy to expand on the tradeoff if that's useful for the review.
Maturity signals
Happy to provide anything else the curation process needs — security notes, usage numbers, or a demo. Thanks for the work on the registry.
All reactions