Advisory patched but never published — what options does a reporter have? #967
Unanswered
BrandonChoKR
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
|
hi @BrandonChoKR and thank you for your questions! unfortunately there isn't anything you can do to force advisory publication when repo owner are unresponsive. GitHub did not receive a CVE request for this GHSA from the maintainers, so you can reach out to another CNA like the MITRE CNA-LR for a CVE ID in this case - and include that we've confirmed we don't have an outstanding/duplicate request to avoid scope conflict we appreciate you taking these extra steps in the interest of security! |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I reported a pre-authentication DoS in
openclaw(npm) on 2026-07-28 throughGitHub's private vulnerability reporting: GHSA-4r25-35qc-fr6j. The maintainers
accepted it, merged a fix on 2026-08-01 (PR #115038, commit
beab295), releasedit in
2026.7.2-beta.7, and accepted my reporter credit.The advisory has been in draft ever since — 35 days. I asked about CVE assignment
twice in the thread and mentioned an owner directly, since publish and Request
CVE require owner permissions. No response to either.
Two things make me think this isn't specific to my report:
Before that, publishing happened in monthly batches, each by a different
individual.
GHSA-jhfx-v2j8-x3m6 (CVSS 7.6, High, published 2026-06-30) lists
"No known CVE." Requesting CVE IDs doesn't appear to be part of this
project's workflow.
Meanwhile
latest(2026.7.1-2) andextended-stable(2026.6.34) still ship thevulnerable code with no patched release on either channel, and the fix commit's
regression test spells out the reproduction publicly. So the vulnerability is
publicly known while affected users have no notice.
I've published a write-up so users have actionable information: [https://brandonlog.tistory.com/159]
My questions:
repository owners are unresponsive?
has occurred, is MITRE CNA-LR the correct path for the CVE ID? I'd rather not
route around GitHub's scope if there's a better option.
Happy to provide any details that would help.
All reactions