-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 217
Description
Version
Extension 1.4.5
CodeQL CLI 2.5.1
Describe the bug
Removing a database after having run queries on it and viewed ASTs and then re-adding a different database at the same file system location (e.g. because you made changes to the source code and then created the database again) prevents browsing the source code of that database.
To Reproduce
- Create a folder
test-db - In that folder create a
Test.javafile with this content:class Test { }
- Run
codeql database create --language=java --source-root=. "--command=javac *.java" db - In VSCode add the
test-db/dbfolder as database - Run any query, e.g.:
import java from Class c where c.fromSource() select c
- Click on the result to open the
.javasource - Run "View AST"
- Optional: Close the
.javafile and remove the AST view and the query result from the list - Use "Remove Database"
- Make a change to the
Test.javafile:class Test { void someMethod() { } }
- Delete the
test-db/dbfolder and create the database again:codeql database create --language=java --source-root=. "--command=javac *.java" db - In VSCode add the database again
- Run any query again, and click on the result
❌ Nothing happens; the CodeQL Query Server output contains:Similarly, clicking on theUnable to handleMsgFromView: cannot open codeql-zip-archive://1-51/#REDACTED#%5Ctest-db%5Cdb%5Csrc.zip/#REDACTED#/test-db/Test.java. Detail: Unable to read file 'codeql-zip-archive://1-51/#REDACTED#\test-db\db\src.zip/#REDACTED#/test-db/Test.java' (Error: unexpected end of file)Test.javasource file in the files explorer of VSCode causes a similar error.
Note: Steps 5 - 8 (inclusive) might not be needed to reproduce this.
Expected behavior
When re-adding a database for which a database with the same folder path existed previously, all state of that previous database should be removed.
Removal of previous database state could happen either when the database is removed, or when a database with the same folder path is re-added. Maybe it would be better to only perform this when re-adding the database (instead of on removal) to allow the user to still view some information after the database has been removed (might be useful when importing test databases).