Conversation
elenatanasoiu
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2023
Contributor
elenatanasoiu
left a comment
elenatanasoiu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! I think modelled is clearer.
I've seen it written as "modeled" in documents. 🇺🇸 Do we want to be consistent with those?
Contributor
Author
Doh, yes! |
Contributor
Author
|
Updated to use "modeled" instead. And also updated an old instance of "Unmodelled". |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I thought that using modelled instead of supported makes more sense when we start giving people a tool to model things themselves.
I didnt rename the query because the predicates matches what is in library, but we could consider that in the future.
Checklist
ready-for-doc-reviewlabel there.