[Issue Arborist] Issue Arborist run — 30 sub-issues linked to existing parents #1782
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Issue Arborist. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #1806. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🌳 Issue Arborist Report
Issues analyzed: 65
Parent issues created
None this run — all identified clusters already had a suitable existing parent issue, so no new parents were created (staying within the conservative-linking guidance).
Links created
Suggested (not linked — for maintainer review)
Observations
[Parent]tracking issues ([Parent] Track and resolve recurring AI-credits rate-limit failures in scheduled agentic workflows #1535, [Parent] Track and resolve recurring agentic workflow execution failures (non-rate-limit) #1549, [Parent] Track and act on upstream dependency release-note action items (awf, mcpg, copilot-cli) #1283, [Parent] MCPG infrastructure and safe-output tooling improvements #1321, [Parent] Compiler internals and pipeline generation improvements (IR types, YAML gen, prompt decoupling) #1286, [Parent] Track agent runtime and execution pipeline improvements #1649, [Parent] Safe-output executor E2E test coverage and tool correctness #1428) that cover most recurring workflow-failure and infrastructure themes; this run mainly attached loose recent issues to those existing trackers rather than creating new ones.[aw]bot reports (rate-limit hits, failed runs, incomplete results) — these are well-served by the two rate-limit/non-rate-limit parent trackers already in place.All reactions