[Issue Arborist] Weekly backlog scan — no new links, suggestions for review #2122
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Issue Arborist. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #2135. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🌳 Issue Arborist Report
Issues analyzed: 62 (open, not already sub-issues)
Parent issues created
None.
Links created
None.
Suggested (not linked — for maintainer review)
The vast majority of open issues already sit under existing parent-tracking
issues (#1283 deps-release-notes, #1286 compiler internals, #1321 MCPG/safe-output
tooling, #1428 executor E2E, #1549 recurring failures, #1649 agent runtime, #2076
self-optimization follow-ups), confirmed via each issue's parent link. The
remaining orphans are related in theme but not in an unambiguous parent/child
sense, so I did not link them:
pipeline variables in workflow source), and [agent-issue]: Agents cannot supply work-item fields;
custom-fieldsis compile-time only, so runtime-computed values never reach ADO #2044 (agents cannot supplyruntime-computed work-item fields) all touch "surface ADO
variables/runtime values into workflow source" but are parallel
features of similar scope — none is clearly broader than the others.
ado-aw vX.Y.Z") are a recurring maintenance pattern but only 3 open
instances — below the 5-issue threshold for a new parent, and each is a
one-off release chore rather than a durable epic.
cross-job provider-env macros) are both compiler-internals refactors that
could arguably join [Parent] Compiler internals and pipeline generation improvements (IR types, YAML gen, prompt decoupling) #1286, but neither is currently linked and I could not
confirm scope-containment without deeper code review.
fresh (today) failure report; too new to confidently cluster.
Observations
belong to a tracking parent from prior Arborist runs.
run, so no new parent issues were created (conservative-linking policy).
under [Parent] Compiler internals and pipeline generation improvements (IR types, YAML gen, prompt decoupling) #1286, and whether the three pipeline-variable-surfacing issues
([aw]: Allow engine.model to be driven by an ADO pipeline variable / variable group #2035, [agent-issue]: support declarative Azure DevOps pipeline variables in workflow source #2012, [agent-issue]: Agents cannot supply work-item fields;
custom-fieldsis compile-time only, so runtime-computed values never reach ADO #2044) should be grouped under a new "runtime-computedconfiguration values" epic once a 4th/5th related issue appears.
All reactions