[Labelling Correction Signal] Discussion #214: Bring back Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6

[mnkiefer]

This issue records trusted label corrections for one discussion. It is a deterministic intake record for later agentic analysis of .github/instructions/community-discussion-labeling.md.

Signal key: githubnext/aw-community-discussions#214
Discussion number: 214
Target repository: githubnext/aw-community-discussions
Discussion URL: githubnext/aw-community-discussions#214
Current category: GitHub Education
Current category slug: github-education
Current labels: GitHub Education, Product Feedback, source:other
Seen labels: GitHub Education, Product Feedback
Seen event types: labeled, unlabeled
Correction count: 4
First correction seen: 2026-04-09T21:01:45.259Z
Last correction seen: 2026-04-10T09:38:20.062Z
Latest event type: labeled
Latest label: Product Feedback

Discussion Snapshot

Title: Bring back Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6

I’m a verified student, and honestly, I’m really disappointed with the changes made to the GitHub Copilot Student plan on March 12, 2026. What made it even worse is that the older Claude models like Opus and Sonnet were also removed from Copilot CLI yesterday. That was kind of the final blow for me. At this point, none of the remaining models feel nearly as good for serious agentic work. GitHub says these changes were made to keep Copilot “free and accessible for millions of students,” but that explanation just doesn’t feel convincing. The number of verified students hasn’t suddenly exploded. GitHub itself has said it’s been around 2 million for years. Students graduate, new students join that cycle has always existed. So this doesn’t really feel like some unexpected surge that suddenly made the plan impossible to maintain. And the people hurt most by this aren’t the students who can already afford paid AI tools. Students in the US or Europe who had the money for Claude Pro or other subscriptions were probably already paying for them anyway. The students who really relied on GitHub Copilot were the ones who couldn’t afford those tools in the first place especially students from developing countries or lower-income backgrounds. For a lot of them, this was the only high quality option they had. Most of us are not trying to exploit the system. We’re using these tools to learn, build projects, contribute to open source, and actually become better developers. Taking away the best models while keeping the same PRU limits doesn’t feel like sustainability. It feels like cutting support for the exact students who are trying hardest to build something meaningful. Please reconsider this. A few possible options: • bring back manual access to Claude Opus / Sonnet for verified students, • let students choose premium models at a higher PRU cost, • or offer a meaningful student discount for pro features/models. Students are not asking for unlimited free access to everything. We’re just asking not to lose the tools that actually made GitHub Copilot valuable in the first place.

Correction History

When	Event	Label
2026-04-09T21:01:45.259Z	labeled	GitHub Education
2026-04-10T09:38:19.407Z	labeled	GitHub Education
2026-04-10T09:38:19.627Z	unlabeled	GitHub Education
2026-04-10T09:38:20.062Z	labeled	Product Feedback