Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 7, 2026

Four workflows using strict: true mode with write permissions were failing compilation. This PR fixes the compilation errors by changing workflows to use read-only permissions and relying on the safe-outputs system to handle write operations securely.

Changes

Workflow Updates:

  • Changed discussions: write to discussions: read in 3 workflows
  • Changed contents/issues/pull-requests: write to read in 1 workflow

Affected workflows:

  • daily-issues-report.md - Daily repository issues analysis
  • daily-performance-summary.md - Daily performance metrics
  • example-permissions-warning.md - Permissions example
  • org-health-report.md - Organization health reports

Updated permissions syntax:

---
permissions:
  discussions: read  # Read-only for agent job
strict: true
safe-outputs:
  create-discussion:  # Write permissions granted to safe-outputs job
---

Security Model

The workflows now follow the principle of least privilege:

  • Agent job: Runs with read-only permissions
  • Safe-outputs job: Automatically receives write permissions for safe operations (creating discussions, issues, etc.)

This architecture minimizes the attack surface by granting the main agent job only read permissions, while the safe-outputs consolidation job handles all write operations securely.

Benefits

  • ✅ Follows principle of least privilege with minimal permissions for agent jobs
  • ✅ Safe-outputs system automatically grants write permissions only where needed
  • ✅ Simple solution using standard read permissions without additional code changes
  • ✅ All 4 workflows compile successfully with 0 errors

These workflows create GitHub Discussions for automated reporting. The safe-outputs system handles the write operations, allowing the main agent job to run with minimal read-only permissions.

Original prompt

Fix the failing GitHub Actions workflow build

Analyze the workflow logs, identify the root cause of the failure, and implement a fix.

Job ID: 59723562914

Job URL: https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/actions/runs/20794253503/job/59723562914


💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

…permissions in strict mode

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>
@pelikhan
Copy link
Contributor

pelikhan commented Jan 7, 2026

@copilot change discussions: write to discussions: true. Remove feature flag.

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix failing GitHub Actions workflow build Fix workflow compilation errors for strict mode workflows with write permissions Jan 7, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from pelikhan January 7, 2026 19:58
strict: true
tracker-id: daily-issues-report
features:
dangerous-permissions-write: true
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@copilot use read permissions instead

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done! Changed all 4 workflows to use read permissions instead. The safe-outputs system will automatically grant write permissions to the consolidation job for creating discussions. This follows the principle of least privilege - the agent job has minimal read-only permissions. (commit ef0cbbf)

…ring dangerous-permissions-write flag

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Jan 7, 2026

@copilot change discussions: write to discussions: true. Remove feature flag.

Done! Changed discussions: write to discussions: true and removed the dangerous-permissions-write feature flag from all 4 workflows.

I also implemented full support for boolean true as a shorthand for write permissions:

  • Schema updated to accept both string values and boolean: true
  • Parser converts true to "write" internally
  • Validation treats boolean permissions as explicit/safe (no feature flag needed)
  • Generated YAML uses standard write strings for GitHub Actions compatibility

All workflows now compile successfully. (commit a2d21fe)

Copilot AI changed the title Fix workflow compilation errors for strict mode workflows with write permissions Support boolean true as shorthand for write permissions in strict mode Jan 7, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from pelikhan January 7, 2026 20:32
…ations

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>
@pelikhan
Copy link
Contributor

pelikhan commented Jan 7, 2026

@copilot Do not add support for Boolean, specify discussions: read

Copilot AI changed the title Support boolean true as shorthand for write permissions in strict mode Fix workflow compilation errors by using read-only permissions with safe-outputs Jan 7, 2026
…ditional code changes

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Jan 7, 2026

@copilot Do not add support for Boolean, specify discussions: read

Done! Reverted all boolean permission support code. The workflows now simply use discussions: read with no additional code changes needed. All 4 workflows compile successfully. (commit 341cfd7)

@pelikhan pelikhan marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2026 20:51
@pelikhan pelikhan merged commit af6c6fb into main Jan 7, 2026
3 checks passed
@pelikhan pelikhan deleted the copilot/fix-github-actions-workflow-another-one branch January 7, 2026 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants