Replies: 1 comment
|
Thanks @Yasin7795 - we probably forgot to update the text after recent changes. We'll get around to cleaning that up as soon as possible. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello,
I might be missing something, but i noticed that notebook 2_03 glm_2 (and subsequent notebooks) claim that the control file being used in the notebooks is the one created in the Pest_from notebook 2_01. Where observations were supposedly weighted in accordance with the measurement noise (they were not!). However, the notebooks actually use the control file created in notebook 2_02 (obs_and_weights). Where observations weightes were set for visibility, and a standard deviation column was added in the observation dataset for use in uncertainty anlysis. Was this done on purpose?
Using these weights in the GLM notebook results in a pretty big objective function at the end of the run. I tried a seperate run with weights set as the inverse of the values set in the standard deviation column and the objective function was much smaller.
Thank you in advance for any help!
All reactions