Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

website: /project/ restructuring of page #21025

cassandraoid opened this issue Jul 15, 2017 · 0 comments

website: /project/ restructuring of page #21025

cassandraoid opened this issue Jul 15, 2017 · 0 comments


Copy link

@cassandraoid cassandraoid commented Jul 15, 2017


These suggestions are assuming that the should get people excited and motivated about participating in the project. That they will be able to navigate through: what the project is and who it came from, what the community around the project looks like, how they can contribute and the future of the project. My suggestions will be more content and organization focused but the design and 'feel' of the site could use an upgrade as well.

Note: this page could use better design navigation for knowing what will be on the page. We could potentially start w/ a statement of intent about what the page will go over, but IMO that's not ideal.

I'll run through the page by referring to specific screenshots to indicate possible changes for future plans to rebuilding the pages.

Sketch for potenital changes:

screen shot 2017-07-15 at 11 47 13 am

  • By who? Would feel more personal if we linked to a team pages or something here. The link to Google is misleading for some reason. Would be nice to define what a contributor is and their importance. “From the community” what community? I see no links or indication on the site that this is a thriving community….

screen shot 2017-07-15 at 11 50 48 am

  • IMO the word users should be avoided in most situations when describing a group of people. If we assume we want to give the feeling of ‘welcome’ then community members could be an alternative.
    Directions unclear. Should be “We encourage all Go community members to join the golang-announce google group and subscribe to receive notifications.”

  • This whole section feels a little out of place, why is it here instead of under developer resources?

  • Also, is that newsletter the only option/ the only form of comm run by the go team?

screen shot 2017-07-15 at 11 55 40 am

  • Build out an entire history section here... not just the versions. If you’re going to have a history portion we should include, where’s the meat on the project itself: who were the creators? Why did they create go? What was the vision?

screen shot 2017-07-15 at 12 22 02 pm

  • Super confusing that these are clickable, def doesn't feel accessible or clear on where I would go if I clicked.

screen shot 2017-07-15 at 12 23 55 pm

  • Are these all the resources? Who are they maintained by? How do I know if I should or should not opt in?

screen shot 2017-07-15 at 12 25 01 pm

  • There have got to be more ways to help than this. (Add Experience Reports here!)

  • There are def other ways to contribute... it'd be nice to build out this section into more inclusive code, community, content.


If these ideas sound on track, we can easily get more granular about the section, language, and information changes (although it should be a part of the entire site redesign.)

@ianlancetaylor ianlancetaylor added this to the Unplanned milestone Apr 13, 2018
@bcmills bcmills changed the title docs: /project/ restructuring of page website: /project/ restructuring of page Apr 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants