Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion _content/blog/pgo.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ Showing nodes accounting for -3.72s, 3.13% of 118.73s total
```

So `runtime.scanobject` is ultimately coming from `runtime.gcBgMarkWorker`.
The [Go GC Guide](/doc/gc-guide#Identiying_costs) tells us that `runtime.gcBgMarkWorker` is part of the garbage collector, so `runtime.scanobject` savings must be GC savings.
The [Go GC Guide](/doc/gc-guide#Identifying_costs) tells us that `runtime.gcBgMarkWorker` is part of the garbage collector, so `runtime.scanobject` savings must be GC savings.
What about `nextFreeFast` and other `runtime` functions?

```
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion _content/doc/gc-guide.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ <h2 id="A_note_about_virtual_memory">A note about virtual memory</h2>

<h2 id="Optimization_guide">Optimization guide</h2>

<h3 id="Identiying_costs">Identifying costs</h3>
<h3 id="Identifying_costs">Identifying costs</h3>

<p>
Before trying to optimize how your Go application interacts with the GC, it's
Expand Down