Skip to content

Delete CodeQL workflow#94

Merged
golles merged 1 commit intomainfrom
delete-codeql-workflow
May 15, 2025
Merged

Delete CodeQL workflow#94
golles merged 1 commit intomainfrom
delete-codeql-workflow

Conversation

@golles
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@golles golles commented May 15, 2025

Proposed change

Remove the CodeQL workflow and use the proposed default setup in the repo settings.
https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/enabling-code-scanning/configuring-default-setup-for-code-scanning

Breaking change

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

@golles golles added the ci Changes to the CI/CD environment label May 15, 2025
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (8e82467) to head (f42192c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #94   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           41        41           
  Lines         2259      2259           
=========================================
  Hits          2259      2259           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@golles golles merged commit 3d8e12f into main May 15, 2025
18 checks passed
@golles golles deleted the delete-codeql-workflow branch May 15, 2025 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci Changes to the CI/CD environment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant