cline-pilot

An Agent Skill: drive Cline CLI coding tasks as the user's proxy.

Dispatch tasks → run Cline non-interactively or interactively → monitor progress from session files + hard evidence (git / test reports) → relay decision points back to the user in a fixed 4-part format → verify against a checklist before reporting done — while learning the user's per-project-tag preferences and gradually making the decisions for them.

Follows the Agent Skills open specification. Works with any agent that supports the standard: Hermes, Cline, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, and more. (Chinese docs: README.zh.md)

# Option 1: npx skills CLI (generic)
npx skills add https://github.com/gongdear/cline-pilot

# Option 2: copy the skill folder into your agent's skills dir
#   Hermes:      ~/.hermes/skills/
#   Cline:       ~/.cline/skills/
#   Claude Code: ~/.claude/skills/
#   Codex:       ~/.codex/skills/
mkdir -p ~/.hermes/skills && cp -r cline-pilot ~/.hermes/skills/

1. First use: the agent will ask for your dev environment (conda/python env name, how the toolchain reaches PATH, task branch naming) and write references/local-config.md (see references/local-config.example.md). That file is private and git-ignored.
2. Give the agent a coding task targeting Cline CLI. The skill activates, picks the right mode, injects the prompt (fixed first line: active memory bank), runs in the background, and monitors via scripts/session_report.py.
3. Verify:

   python3 scripts/session_report.py 15 /path/to/repo

cline-pilot/
├── SKILL.md                          # core workflow (<150 lines, loaded on activation)
├── README.md / README.zh.md
├── LICENSE                           # MIT
├── scripts/
│   └── session_report.py             # read-only monitor: session messages + git/surefire evidence (stdlib only)
├── references/
│   ├── cold-start.md                 # cold-start handbook (new projects: no clinerules/memory-bank)
│   ├── local-config.example.md       # template → private local-config.md
│   ├── project-profiles.example.md   # template → private project-profiles.md
│   └── decision-log.example.md       # template → private decision-log.md
└── assets/
    └── global-memory-bank-prompt.md  # verbatim global memory-bank prompt (must be in place before any memory bank)

SKILL.md loads only when activated; references/* on demand; the script is deterministic code — the agent doesn't improvise monitoring each time.

• Cold-start gate — before any memory bank is activated, the default global memory-bank prompt must already be in place (assets/global-memory-bank-prompt.md, verbatim template)
• Two cold-start paths — no code yet: rules are assembled by asking the user dimension by dimension; legacy code: rules are grounded in a code scan
• No architecture in the skill — project technical facts belong to the project's memory bank / clinerules; the skill holds intro + tags + learned preferences only
• Deterministic first — anything that must be right every time is a script, not a prompt the model re-derives per run
• Evidence over self-report — completion is proved by git status, test-report numbers, and non-empty artifacts, never by the agent's own claim
• Learning loop — correction → decision-log.md (per tag class) → ≥2 consistent samples → distilled into the preference section of SKILL.md
• Privacy by layer — public files (SKILL.md, scripts, templates) carry zero user-specific secrets; private state stays in git-ignored references/*.md

Cline's cost/quality balance changes dramatically between the cold-start and the steady-state phases. Recommended setup (maintainer-validated on a real multi-module production backend):

1. Initialization — use a strong long-context (paid) model. Give it the full weight: whole-project codebase scan, writing project rules (clinerules / memory-bank seed) grounded in what the code actually does, and authoring one or two template test/code patterns representative of the project (assertion style, mock granularity, naming, edge-case coverage). This phase is read-heavy and long-context-heavy — exactly where frontier models pay for themselves. A single good cold start prevents most rework later: every batch after it is constrained by the rules it wrote.

2. Steady state — switch to a small local model for the task loop. Once the rules + templates exist, each batch is a small, tightly-scoped task with an explicit spec (target class, test file path, mock list, assertion requirements). That shape is ideal for a local, low-parameter model (any open model in the ~30B class works; the maintainer runs a local Qwen-class build via Ollama): the skill's task-spec granularity, the anti-hallucination protocol, and per-batch verification carry the discipline, so model quality can be traded against cost/privacy/throughput.

Rule of thumb: frontier model buys the rules once; the local model runs the discipline every day. If a local batch fails the same assertion 3 times in a row, that is a signal the template/rules are the gap — escalate that batch back to the stronger model, don't keep burning local retries.

npx @anthropics/skills-ref validate .   # or: skills-ref validate ./cline-pilot
python3 -m py_compile scripts/session_report.py
python3 scripts/session_report.py 5 /path/to/repo

• New pitfalls / patterns → PR into SKILL.md (keep it under 500 lines)
• New scripts → scripts/, stdlib only, independently runnable
• Follow the spec: https://agentskills.io/specification

MIT — see LICENSE