Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 24, 2018. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@btracey
Copy link
Member

@btracey btracey commented Oct 13, 2015

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we do this by a normal sort and then a simple slice reverse function written here? That avoids the double interface resolution that what's here costs.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. I thought this was the idiomatic code based on the example.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See what the performance difference is?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we leave it as is now and re-assess when we have the functions that call it in context? This way we have a better guess on typical sizes.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No worries.

@kortschak
Copy link
Member

LGTM

btracey added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2015
@btracey btracey merged commit 7373a92 into master Oct 13, 2015
@btracey btracey deleted the adddlasrt branch October 13, 2015 18:08
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants