Conversation
|
Hi @jacob314, thank you so much for your contribution to Gemini CLI! We really appreciate the time and effort you've put into this. We're making some updates to our contribution process to improve how we track and review changes. Please take a moment to review our recent discussion post: Improving Our Contribution Process & Introducing New Guidelines. Key Update: Starting January 26, 2026, the Gemini CLI project will require all pull requests to be associated with an existing issue. Any pull requests not linked to an issue by that date will be automatically closed. Thank you for your understanding and for being a part of our community! |
Summary of ChangesHello @jacob314, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the border styling mechanism for tool group messages, centralizing the logic for determining border color and dimming into a dedicated utility function. This change enhances the flexibility and consistency of UI feedback for tool execution states, particularly for shell commands, by allowing explicit border properties to be passed through the component hierarchy. Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Size Change: +2.19 kB (+0.01%) Total Size: 24.5 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the logic for determining the tool group border color by extracting it into a new function getToolGroupBorderAppearance. While this is a good refactoring for centralization, it introduces a critical bug in useGeminiStream.ts. The onComplete callback for useToolScheduler now attempts to use activeShellPtyId before it is declared, which will cause a ReferenceError at runtime. My review includes a critical comment to fix this issue by providing the correct border appearance for completed tool groups, which also resolves the crash.
8b2f211 to
8086afd
Compare
| staticAreaMaxItemHeight, | ||
| availableTerminalHeight, | ||
| cleanUiDetailsVisible, | ||
| activePtyId, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The historyItems and pendingItems memoizations now depend on activePtyId, embeddedShellFocused, and backgroundShells. While necessary for the dynamic styling, activePtyId and embeddedShellFocused can change frequently during shell interactions. Re-mapping the entire uiState.history on every change to these values might be expensive if the history grows large.
Consider if the border color calculation could be scoped more tightly or if the performance impact has been measured for large sessions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
fantastic suggestion. I've implemented this.
| // Since there are no tools to inspect, it falls back to empty pending, but isCurrentlyInShellTurn=true | ||
| // so it counts as pending shell. | ||
| expect(result.borderColor).toEqual(theme.ui.symbol); | ||
| // It shouldn't be dim because there are no tools to say it isEmbeddedShellFocused = false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The comment mentions isCurrentlyInShellTurn=true but doesn't explicitly verify the borderDimColor expectation, which would be helpful for clarity.
|
/patch preview |
|
/patch stable |
|
✅ Patch workflow(s) dispatched successfully! 📋 Details:
🔗 Track Progress: |
|
✅ Patch workflow(s) dispatched successfully! 📋 Details:
🔗 Track Progress: |
Summary
Before:

After:

Fixes #19265
Details:
Properly testing requires pending changes to use xterm to extract terminal colors correctly.