Conversation
|
Hi @DavidAPierce, thank you so much for your contribution to Gemini CLI! We really appreciate the time and effort you've put into this. We're making some updates to our contribution process to improve how we track and review changes. Please take a moment to review our recent discussion post: Improving Our Contribution Process & Introducing New Guidelines. Key Update: Starting January 26, 2026, the Gemini CLI project will require all pull requests to be associated with an existing issue. Any pull requests not linked to an issue by that date will be automatically closed. Thank you for your understanding and for being a part of our community! |
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a potential security vulnerability by enhancing the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a crucial security fix by preventing prototype pollution in the recursivelyHydrateStrings function. The changes include adding an ignore list for specific object keys (__proto__, constructor, prototype) during JSON unmarshalling and updating the recursivelyHydrateStrings function to utilize this list. New test cases have also been added to verify the effectiveness of this fix against prototype pollution. This is a significant improvement for the security posture of the application.
|
Size Change: +145 B (0%) Total Size: 26 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
quick fix to spelling in a comment. Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
Added an ignore list for object keys when unmarshalling JSON in recursivelyHydrateStrings.
Details
The recursivelyHydrateStrings function now sanitizes object keys by skipping proto, constructor, and prototype.
Added tests to verify this.
Related Issues
Fixes https://github.com/google-gemini/maintainers-gemini-cli/issues/1499